![]() |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() CBS Sportsline CNN/SI ESPN NFL Pro Football Weekly Sporting News USA Today Fantasy Football Links Fantasy Football 101 Preseason Features Reg. Season Features 2007 Archives 2006 Archives 2005 Archives 2004 Archives 2003 Archives Official Rules Great White Shark Whale Shark One Whale Shark Two The WALL - IDP Only League History Shark Team Buttons and Banners Advertising MyFantasyLeague.com ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The 3rd Year Wide Receiver Breakout Rul… Theor… Hypothesis
The Geekly Details, Sponsored by Nytol® Sleep Aid For this to be true, 3rd year wide receiver gains should differ significantly from the whole population by a significant margin which tradition says we should call 5%. Later on, the true "breakout year" is defined as when the player hits their 5-year max or exceeded their 5 year average by 10% or more, whichever came first. In all the following charts and analyses, growth is measured in fantasy points using 1 point per reception or 10 yards, and 6 points per touchdown.
Before we dive in…
Here we can see that gains of 50% or more into fantasy relevance mostly happen between the ages of 24 and 27, with nearly half (44%) occurring at age 24 or 25 (yellow). Meanwhile the average wideout age in any given season is about 26 (blue). This peak range gets slightly wider, shifting a bit older, when we include those players who missed time in the previous season (pink). This also says that fewer than 20% of wideouts will ever see a points jump of 50%+ from one season to the next once they hit age 28. None of this is surprising, but probably good to know.
Here you can see that third year wideouts (yellow) are about 2% more likely than other receivers to have a 25%-50% growth and 3% more likely to have up to a 25% decline. This chart shows the growth pattern of wideouts with at least 28 receptions the season prior, but the 6 reception minimum shows basically the same pattern.
Next we drop those who had a significant play time change between the two seasons. This will weed out growth or decline due to injury or a role change for which you just need a depth chart to figure out. This also happens to narrow our samples to wideouts starting at about a WR3 or better. Here you see the pattern grows more extreme, now 3% more likely to see 25-50% growth, but also 7% more likely to see up to a 25% decline. Not looking good. So now what? Someone suggested having a look at 2 years, so here goes!
Purty, ain’t it? In general we see that 5-10% in the first year, 55% break out in the second year, 25% in the third year. This puts the final nail in the “3rd Year Hypothesis” coffin, but this may still be useful yet! If you exclude those players who have already “broken out” from the rookie class each season, these data suggest about 60% (55/95) of the remainder will break out in their second year, with about 55% (25/45) of the following remainder breaking out in their 3rd year. Eureka!
The charts!! Arrghh! The charts!!! What does all this mean?!? All is not lost though as we can see that age does matter and we have a new hypothesis! (Pet peeve note: Gravity is a theory, stupid math tricks on football data are hypotheses.) “The 5-60-55 Wide Receiver Hypothesis” that says 5% of a given rookie class will break out in their first year, 60% who didn’t break out in their first year will break out with widely varied results in their second, and 55% who didn’t break out in their first or second year who showed any progress in their second year will break out at 70% average growth in their third. The bottom line: Half the guys who didn’t do too much in their first year and showed modest progress in their second will breakout in their third. And if it didn't happen by the third, it probably ain't gonna happen.
The obvious question Mark Clayton (BAL), Braylon Edwards (CLE), Reggie Brown (PHI), Matt Jones (JAX), Nate Washington (PIT), Vincent Jackson (SDG), Brandon Jones (TEN), Troy Williamson (MIN), Roscoe Parrish (BUF), Mark Bradley (CHI), Jamal Jones (NOS), Carlyle Holiday (GBP), Josh Cribbs (CLE), Chad Owens (JAX) Chris Henry (CIN) also made the list at #4, but will be suspended for the first 8 games.
Wrap it up! |
|
|||||||||||
|
Home | Top | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Advertise Copyright © 2008 by FantasySharks.com |