Fantasy Football Sharks
shd_centercol
Save $15 at MyFantasyLeague.com!

Shop at ...
Shop at the FINS online store!

Fantasy Sharks Tickets

Useful Links
CBS Sportsline
CNN/SI
ESPN
NFL
Pro Football Weekly
Sporting News
USA Today
Fantasy Football Links

Archived Features
Fantasy Football 101
Preseason Features
Reg. Season Features
2007 Archives
2006 Archives
2005 Archives
2004 Archives
2003 Archives

Shark Showcase Leagues
Official Rules
Great White Shark
Whale Shark One
Whale Shark Two
The WALL - IDP Only
League History

Contact Us
Shark Team
Buttons and Banners
Advertising

League Affiliations
MyFantasyLeague.com

Subscribe
Subscribe in Google
Subscribe in My Yahoo!
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Subscribe in Bloglines
Subscribe in My AOL

Fantasy Football Memorabilia

Fantasy Football Recordings


What I am going to do in this article is offer a bit on incite into a couple intriguing on-the-field matchups for the coming week’s games. Will it be of relevance to you? I don’t know, and I don’t care. Anyone can say the New England passing offense is going to have a big week, or Minnesota’s pass defense can be had, or you can run on the Jets. I’m going to dig a little further and identify matchups that you may not be 100% clear what to make of and try to help you make those tough WSIS questions for the week. Let’s get the ball rolling…

Kansas City secondary vs. Green Bay passing offense

It’s been well documented that Green Bay’s had problems running the ball all year. Is it attributable to them playing strong run D’s, their OLine not creating holes, them lacking playmakers, or a little of everything? Probably a little of everything. The first defense they’ve had success running on this year happens to be the worst team in the league against the run. For now, we’ll assume the Pack will revert to their substandard ways of running the ball against KC; I could be proven wrong, but we’ve got to make some assumption to properly compare their passing attack to KC’s secondary. Moving along…

KC’s pass defense has put up some very nice numbers so far in 07. 

197 yds/gm [10th]

6 TDs [T-4th]

8 INTs [T-8th]

21 sacks [6th]

My problem? Those numbers are very misleading. The Chefs have only played two teams that are in the top half in the league in passing. Those teams? Houston and Cincy. Both of which had good games through the air against the Chefs

Schaub 225/1/1

Carson 320/2/2

Andre Johnson 7/142/1

Housh 8/145/1

Ocho 8/83

Green Bay’s had success throwing the ball as we all know and the love has been spread amongst several different players. Given KC’s defensive performance against opposing pass catchers it is safe to assume that Donald Driver [Green Bay’s #1, flanker] will have the most success of the bunch this week. The opposition’s #1 WR has routinely had success against this unit

AJ 7/142/1

Berrian 5/65

Minnesota doesn’t have a #1 WR

Gates 6/79

Northcutt 4/73/1 [even Northcutt had a big game against the Chefs]

Housh 8/145/1 Ocho 8/83

Curry 4/45/1

Start Driver with confidence this week, and if you’re forced to start either Jennings or James Jones you may be pleasantly surprised as well. The Chefs pass D is not all its cracked up to be.

Pittsburgh vs. Baltimore – the running games

Yes, these two teams have two of the stiffest run D’s in the league; I know I’m not supposed to start my RBs against them.

Baltimore’s run D 78 yds/gm, 3.8 ypc, 1 TD

Pitt’s run D 72 yds/gm, 2.9 ypc, 2 TDs

However, my stud RB is going against these guys this week [if you’re the FWP or McGahee owner]; always start your studs, right?

McGahee 146 carries, 639 rush yds [3rd in the league], 24 rec, 153 rec yds, 3 TDs, 4.4 ypc

FWP 164 carries, 726 rush yds [2nd in the league], 12 rec, 85 rec yds, 2 TDs, 4.4 ypc

Wrong! I am a firm believer in the ASYS theory and there are rare circumstances you bench your stud. This is one of them, in which there is a history of data showing this player struggles against this particular opponent. The last four Pittsburgh/BMore matchups and how the runners for each team fared

11/26/06 @ BMore [27-0 BMore] FWP 10/22, 2/15 J Lew 17/66/1, 1/4

12/24/06 @ PIT [31-7 BMore] FWP 13/29, J Lew 16/77/1, 2/21

10/31/05 @ PIT [20-19 PIT] FWP 14/63, 2/18 J Lew 17/61, 1/0

11/20/05 @ BMore [16-13 BMore] FWP 18/59, 2/22/1 J Lew/Chester 32/87, 4/26

Avg PITT performance 13.75/43.25, 1.5/13.75/.25 → 8 nonPPR fantasy pts

Avg BMore performance 20.5/72.75/.5, 1.75/12.75 → 10.5 nonPPR fantasy pts [small deduction taken due to committee situation in 11/20/05 game]

These are not the types of performances you want to be relying on this week. The Turkeys have had a little more success historically against the Squeelers, but the OLine just isn’t the same anymore; I wouldn’t even be expecting the BMore running attack to match the four game average of 10.5 pts. This just isn’t the week to start either of these guys. Unless bye weeks and injuries have left you zero alternative options you need to bench these guys this week. The only RBs I would start them over would be any of the Tampa Bay RBs or any of the Carolina RBs. Take a look over the schedule and note some of the players I’m pubbing over these two guys; they’re not worth it. Take a risk on a guy like Norwood, Rudi Johnson, or Ryan Grant before plugging either of these studs in; I’d rather gamble on them than settle for 50 yds from my stud and a small chance of hitting pay dirt, hopefully the risk will be worth the reward.



Top of The Tank
Passing on RB's early and going stud QB/WR? I did...
12 Team, 10th pick (Only a serpintine for the first 2 rounds, then random ...
So much for taking Chris Perry with a late pick in the draft
Bengals cautiously name Perry starting RB ...
Stat Projections - How do Sharks do it?
We all have slightly different scoring systems, so not all rankings apply to ...
"I can't believe they drafted...."
Is it too early for that thread? I hope not. Blue Shark 12: ...
Beginning a Draft w/ an RB "Run"
I dion't know if I'm posting this in the corrct place, so if I'm not, I ...
Source: SJax gets paid
10th round help
I'm in the 10th round in my ppr $$ league, i'm in need of the sharks help in ...

*The above views are not necessarily endorsed or approved by FantasySharks