feral pig wrote: Fighting Amish wrote:
especially if they troll someone else's conversation for purely provocation and amusement..
There are people on here that I disagree with, but respect. You are a worthless piece of cr@p.
guilty as ch@rged..
..i couldn't help poking a little fun at your....sensitivities and irritable bowel syndrome..
I'd suggest you lighten up Francine, the tightness in your undies is shutting off the supply to your
Medull@ oblongat@..just sayin, not healthy. Now, im not going to be able to sleep at night, th@nks.
To assess whether the airborne fraction is indeed increasing, Wolfgang Knorr of the Department of Earth Sciences at the University of Bristol reanalyzed available atmospheric carbon dioxide and emissions data since 1850 and considers the uncertainties in the data.
In contradiction to some recent studies, he finds that the airborne fraction of carbon dioxide has not increased either during the past 150 years or during the most recent five decades.
The research is published in Geophysical Research Letters.
And, btw..CO2 accounted for 0.04% of the atmosphere in 1860 and 0.04% today, sooooo.. CO2 isn't a cause of warming - at least not now, and not over the last 150 years, as your hysterics claim. And despite the predictions of climate-carbon cycle models, no trends in the airborne fraction can be found. Information is a good thing, you really shouldn't be scared.
"When it comes to the Browns, hope is a dangerous thing." - Red
“However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results.”