FantasySharks.com

There are two types of Fantasy Football Owners: Sharks and Chum, which are you?
It is currently Sat 04.19.2014, 09:30

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue 04.03.2012, 21:54 
Offline
Great White Shark
Great White Shark
User avatar

Joined: Mon 10.29.2007, 04:16
Posts: 2146
Sand$: 428
Donate
Location: NW NM
kc.gif
http://games.yahoo.com/blogs/plugged-in ... 47052.html

Quote:
Arizona bill could criminalize Internet trolling

Arizona marches to the beat of its own drummer. But if that drummer gets upset and starts hollering on the Internet, he might get tossed in the clink.

After spending years targeting illegal aliens, the Grand Canyon State is turning its sights on obnoxious Internet users (commonly called 'trolls'). A new update to the state's telecommunications harassment bill could make the practice of harassing people online illegal.
Arizona House Bill 2549 has already passed both of the state's legislative bodies and is currently sitting on the desk of Governor Jan Brewer. While there's a lot in there that doesn't concern trolling, here's the line that has people worried:

It is unlawful for any person, with intent to terrify, intimidate, threaten, harass, annoy or offend, to use ANY ELECTRONIC OR DIGITAL DEVICE and use any obscene, lewd or profane language or suggest any lewd or lascivious act, or threaten to inflict physical harm to the person or property of any person.

Violators could be charged with a Class 1 misdemeanor and face up to 6 months in jail. If electronic devices are used to stalk someone, the charges then become a Class 3 felony, with penalties ranging from a minimum sentence of two and a half years in jail for non-dangerous offenders with no prior record to 25 years.

At the heart of the bill is an anti-bullying agenda. Cyber-bullying has been on the rise in recent years and has been in the news lately. A 2010 report in The New York Times found that one of out five middle-school students said they had been victims of cyberbullying.

Despite its good intentions, the Arizona law is already being called "overly broad" by critics. By using vague terms like "annoy" and "offend," it could easily encompass Internet forums or even comments like the ones found at the end of this story.

Free speech groups say they don't believe the law would ever stand up to court scrutiny if Gov. Brewer does, in fact, sign it. And many have pointed out the flaws in the bill to the governor herself.

"Government may criminalize speech that rises to the level of harassment and many states have laws that do so, but this legislation takes a law meant to address irritating phone calls and applies it to communication on web sites, blogs, listserves and other Internet communication," Media Coalition wrote in a letter last week.



Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue 04.03.2012, 22:07 
Offline
Moderatorbaiter
User avatar

Joined: Sun 07.10.2005, 07:33
Posts: 23334
Sand$: 9212
Donate
Location: Aggieland
dal.gif
Mursenary wrote:
http://games.yahoo.com/blogs/plugged-in/arizona-bill-could-criminalize-internet-trolling-184547052.html

Quote:
Arizona bill could criminalize Internet trolling

Arizona marches to the beat of its own drummer. But if that drummer gets upset and starts hollering on the Internet, he might get tossed in the clink.

After spending years targeting illegal aliens, the Grand Canyon State is turning its sights on obnoxious Internet users (commonly called 'trolls'). A new update to the state's telecommunications harassment bill could make the practice of harassing people online illegal.
Arizona House Bill 2549 has already passed both of the state's legislative bodies and is currently sitting on the desk of Governor Jan Brewer. While there's a lot in there that doesn't concern trolling, here's the line that has people worried:

It is unlawful for any person, with intent to terrify, intimidate, threaten, harass, annoy or offend, to use ANY ELECTRONIC OR DIGITAL DEVICE and use any obscene, lewd or profane language or suggest any lewd or lascivious act, or threaten to inflict physical harm to the person or property of any person.

Violators could be charged with a Class 1 misdemeanor and face up to 6 months in jail. If electronic devices are used to stalk someone, the charges then become a Class 3 felony, with penalties ranging from a minimum sentence of two and a half years in jail for non-dangerous offenders with no prior record to 25 years.

At the heart of the bill is an anti-bullying agenda. Cyber-bullying has been on the rise in recent years and has been in the news lately. A 2010 report in The New York Times found that one of out five middle-school students said they had been victims of cyberbullying.

Despite its good intentions, the Arizona law is already being called "overly broad" by critics. By using vague terms like "annoy" and "offend," it could easily encompass Internet forums or even comments like the ones found at the end of this story.

Free speech groups say they don't believe the law would ever stand up to court scrutiny if Gov. Brewer does, in fact, sign it. And many have pointed out the flaws in the bill to the governor herself.

"Government may criminalize speech that rises to the level of harassment and many states have laws that do so, but this legislation takes a law meant to address irritating phone calls and applies it to communication on web sites, blogs, listserves and other Internet communication," Media Coalition wrote in a letter last week.



Oh heck no. If this spreads, it could shut down the General Talk forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue 04.03.2012, 22:39 
Offline
Megalodon
Megalodon
User avatar

Joined: Sat 10.17.2009, 23:41
Posts: 11212
Sand$: 14722
Donate
Location: Texas
dal.gif
StoneCutter wrote:
Mursenary wrote:
http://games.yahoo.com/blogs/plugged-in/arizona-bill-could-criminalize-internet-trolling-184547052.html

Quote:
Arizona bill could criminalize Internet trolling

Arizona marches to the beat of its own drummer. But if that drummer gets upset and starts hollering on the Internet, he might get tossed in the clink.

After spending years targeting illegal aliens, the Grand Canyon State is turning its sights on obnoxious Internet users (commonly called 'trolls'). A new update to the state's telecommunications harassment bill could make the practice of harassing people online illegal.
Arizona House Bill 2549 has already passed both of the state's legislative bodies and is currently sitting on the desk of Governor Jan Brewer. While there's a lot in there that doesn't concern trolling, here's the line that has people worried:

It is unlawful for any person, with intent to terrify, intimidate, threaten, harass, annoy or offend, to use ANY ELECTRONIC OR DIGITAL DEVICE and use any obscene, lewd or profane language or suggest any lewd or lascivious act, or threaten to inflict physical harm to the person or property of any person.

Violators could be charged with a Class 1 misdemeanor and face up to 6 months in jail. If electronic devices are used to stalk someone, the charges then become a Class 3 felony, with penalties ranging from a minimum sentence of two and a half years in jail for non-dangerous offenders with no prior record to 25 years.

At the heart of the bill is an anti-bullying agenda. Cyber-bullying has been on the rise in recent years and has been in the news lately. A 2010 report in The New York Times found that one of out five middle-school students said they had been victims of cyberbullying.

Despite its good intentions, the Arizona law is already being called "overly broad" by critics. By using vague terms like "annoy" and "offend," it could easily encompass Internet forums or even comments like the ones found at the end of this story.

Free speech groups say they don't believe the law would ever stand up to court scrutiny if Gov. Brewer does, in fact, sign it. And many have pointed out the flaws in the bill to the governor herself.

"Government may criminalize speech that rises to the level of harassment and many states have laws that do so, but this legislation takes a law meant to address irritating phone calls and applies it to communication on web sites, blogs, listserves and other Internet communication," Media Coalition wrote in a letter last week.



Oh heck no. If this spreads, it could shut down the General Talk forum.

Everyone on of us would be up on charges.

The Main Tank would become a shell of its former self.


So if something annoys me on TV does the actor and the writer get charged?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue 04.03.2012, 22:45 
Offline
Moderatorbaiter
User avatar

Joined: Sun 07.10.2005, 07:33
Posts: 23334
Sand$: 9212
Donate
Location: Aggieland
dal.gif
625james wrote:
StoneCutter wrote:
Mursenary wrote:
http://games.yahoo.com/blogs/plugged-in/arizona-bill-could-criminalize-internet-trolling-184547052.html

Quote:
Arizona bill could criminalize Internet trolling

Arizona marches to the beat of its own drummer. But if that drummer gets upset and starts hollering on the Internet, he might get tossed in the clink.

After spending years targeting illegal aliens, the Grand Canyon State is turning its sights on obnoxious Internet users (commonly called 'trolls'). A new update to the state's telecommunications harassment bill could make the practice of harassing people online illegal.
Arizona House Bill 2549 has already passed both of the state's legislative bodies and is currently sitting on the desk of Governor Jan Brewer. While there's a lot in there that doesn't concern trolling, here's the line that has people worried:

It is unlawful for any person, with intent to terrify, intimidate, threaten, harass, annoy or offend, to use ANY ELECTRONIC OR DIGITAL DEVICE and use any obscene, lewd or profane language or suggest any lewd or lascivious act, or threaten to inflict physical harm to the person or property of any person.

Violators could be charged with a Class 1 misdemeanor and face up to 6 months in jail. If electronic devices are used to stalk someone, the charges then become a Class 3 felony, with penalties ranging from a minimum sentence of two and a half years in jail for non-dangerous offenders with no prior record to 25 years.

At the heart of the bill is an anti-bullying agenda. Cyber-bullying has been on the rise in recent years and has been in the news lately. A 2010 report in The New York Times found that one of out five middle-school students said they had been victims of cyberbullying.

Despite its good intentions, the Arizona law is already being called "overly broad" by critics. By using vague terms like "annoy" and "offend," it could easily encompass Internet forums or even comments like the ones found at the end of this story.

Free speech groups say they don't believe the law would ever stand up to court scrutiny if Gov. Brewer does, in fact, sign it. And many have pointed out the flaws in the bill to the governor herself.

"Government may criminalize speech that rises to the level of harassment and many states have laws that do so, but this legislation takes a law meant to address irritating phone calls and applies it to communication on web sites, blogs, listserves and other Internet communication," Media Coalition wrote in a letter last week.



Oh heck no. If this spreads, it could shut down the General Talk forum.

Everyone on of us would be up on charges.

The Main Tank would become a shell of its former self.


So if something annoys me on TV does the actor and the writer get charged?


Oh good point. I wouldn't mind seeing every talking head on CNN/FoxNews/ABC/NBC/CBS get their turn with big bubba during their stay behind bars.



Seriously though, this has no chance of passing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue 04.03.2012, 22:51 
Offline
Moderatorbaiter
User avatar

Joined: Sun 07.10.2005, 07:33
Posts: 23334
Sand$: 9212
Donate
Location: Aggieland
dal.gif
Wow! I just noticed this already passed the Arizona legislature and is just awaiting signing by the governor.

:F How f'n stupid. Do these legislators even read this stuff before they vote on it? (Yes, I realize the irony of the question knowing that this does indeed happen.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue 04.03.2012, 23:05 
Offline
Megalodon
Megalodon
User avatar

Joined: Sat 10.17.2009, 23:41
Posts: 11212
Sand$: 14722
Donate
Location: Texas
dal.gif
StoneCutter wrote:
Wow! I just noticed this already passed the Arizona legislature and is just awaiting signing by the governor.

:F How f'n stupid. Do these legislators even read this stuff before they vote on it? (Yes, I realize the irony of the question knowing that this does indeed happen.)


Third and Long is in Arizona, will we get in trouble if we annoy him? What if he annoys another shark?






I hope I didn't just annoy him.






What if something I write doesn't annoy him at first, but then he reads it again after a couple of years and then gets annoyed :-k


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue 04.03.2012, 23:51 
Offline
Great White Shark
Great White Shark
User avatar

Joined: Mon 10.29.2007, 04:16
Posts: 2146
Sand$: 428
Donate
Location: NW NM
kc.gif
625james wrote:
Third and Long is in Arizona, will we get in trouble if we annoy him? What if he annoys another shark?

I hope I didn't just annoy him.

What if something I write doesn't annoy him at first, but then he reads it again after a couple of years and then gets annoyed :-k


No. I think we can annoy him all we want, he just can't annoy us. That's my understanding at least.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed 04.04.2012, 06:07 
Offline
Megalodon
Megalodon
User avatar

Joined: Sat 05.16.2009, 09:57
Posts: 24128
Sand$: 30939
Donate
Location: Arkansas
mia.gif
Some of the things they describe are already illegal. Their additions are unconstitutional. Illegal to annoy or offend? That's nice and vague.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed 04.04.2012, 06:53 
Offline
Megalodon
Megalodon
User avatar

Joined: Mon 05.31.2004, 04:01
Posts: 14200
Sand$: 4701
Donate
I just lawyered up in case something goes down.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed 04.04.2012, 07:04 
Offline
Megalodon
Megalodon
User avatar

Joined: Sat 05.16.2009, 09:57
Posts: 24128
Sand$: 30939
Donate
Location: Arkansas
mia.gif
SonOfDad wrote:
I just lawyered up in case something goes down.


What are you implying? I'm offended!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed 04.04.2012, 07:11 
Offline
Megalodon
Megalodon
User avatar

Joined: Tue 09.06.2005, 10:44
Posts: 14584
Sand$: 8423
Donate
Location: City of Champions
pit.gif
i'm fkuced.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed 04.04.2012, 07:59 
Offline
Supreme Megalodon
Supreme Megalodon
User avatar

Joined: Thu 08.31.2006, 19:28
Posts: 30859
Sand$: 45771
Donate
Location: Home of UNI Panthers
min.gif
Nothing like pissing on the constitution. Be proud, Arizona!

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed 04.04.2012, 08:18 
Offline
HammerHead Shark
User avatar

Joined: Thu 01.13.2011, 09:55
Posts: 986
Sand$: 964
Donate
cin.gif
it was found unconstitutional to pull a person over to make sure they were legal, just because the color of their skin. but they still don't want any brown people in their state, this is their way of getting around the first law.

_________________
elven wrote:
i fully support name-calling and profanity in general.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed 04.04.2012, 08:20 
Offline
Supreme Megalodon
Supreme Megalodon
User avatar

Joined: Wed 10.26.2005, 14:02
Posts: 33108
Sand$: 14038
Donate
Location: Way down, below the ocean
chi.gif
The title of this thread is absolutely awesome, btw. :headbang:

_________________
The darkness must go
Down the river of night's dreaming
Flow morphia slow
Let the sun and light come streaming
Into my life, into my life


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed 04.04.2012, 08:22 
Offline
Supreme Megalodon
Supreme Megalodon
User avatar

Joined: Thu 08.31.2006, 19:28
Posts: 30859
Sand$: 45771
Donate
Location: Home of UNI Panthers
min.gif
Alfman wrote:
it was found unconstitutional to pull a person over to make sure they were legal, just because the color of their skin. but they still don't want any brown people in their state, this is their way of getting around the first law.

All they have are brown people in that state... :? Even the formerly white people are now brown.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: goingmadd, Google Adsense [Bot], MSNbot Media, neal123454, pwbowen and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group