jcalebmoore wrote:TheNataliePortmans wrote:jcalebmoore wrote:Nope. Tanner is the more likely handcuff even at this point IMO. Showing up and failing the conditioning test will probably be the last straw in that transition.
That's pure speculation on your part.
Maybe you'll be right, maybe you won't.
By the way, can we all agree to excise "IMO" from our lexicon?
We know it's your opinion. It's a discussion board.
So there are no statements of fact here? Don't be ridiculous. It's worth noting when something is opinion or speculation instead of based on fact.
I hate to engage in another argument so soon, so I'll just leave this here...
RBX ran for YYYY yards in 2011. (Fact)
RBX will run for YYYY yards in 2012. (Opinion)
Haha, there's never a scenario where IMO or "I think" is needed, it's just a habit for a lot of people. Almost everyone slips on occasion and does it.