FantasySharks.com

There are two types of Fantasy Football Owners: Sharks and Chum, which are you?
It is currently Wed 09.17.2014, 08:31

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri 08.03.2012, 20:49 
Offline
Blue Shark

Joined: Tue 09.28.2010, 22:56
Posts: 306
Sand$: 1364
Donate
I've been seeing dude go as high as the 4th round in some mocks. It there something I'm missing here?

_________________
Rivers, Newton,
Charles, Sporles, TRich
Amendola, Steve Smith, Shorts, Michael Floyd, Harry Douglas,
Julian Thomas,
Seahawks
Succup Bullock


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri 08.03.2012, 20:52 
Offline
Great White Shark
Great White Shark
User avatar

Joined: Sat 09.27.2008, 12:48
Posts: 8376
Sand$: 11623
Donate
Location: Hangin' with A-Rod at Lambeau
gb.gif
Yes...he's one of the few remaining single starting RBs in a league that is swiftly converting to full fledged RBBC across the board. The fact that he will be THE guy carrying the ball for a very high powered offense makes him VERY valuable.

_________________
This is my clever signature


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri 08.03.2012, 20:59 
Offline
Supreme Megalodon
Supreme Megalodon
User avatar

Joined: Sat 05.16.2009, 09:57
Posts: 28967
Sand$: 32788
Donate
Location: Arkansas
mia.gif
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=286321


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri 08.03.2012, 21:06 
Offline
Chum

Joined: Tue 09.06.2011, 11:45
Posts: 12
Sand$: 24
Donate
Concerning Ridley, quicker and more powerful than the law firm and he has fantastic burst. Actually a better faster model of the firm. Should score dbl digit tds if N.E. uses him the way they used the law firm last year.. One problem, he fumbles, he will be on a short leash if he doesn't correct this. So, he's your typical high risk high return type player. I'm going to take him if he falls to me and fits my draftng sequence at the time. But, I'm a gambler, he's not for the faint of heart. No guts, no glory. :party-smiley-050:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri 08.03.2012, 21:07 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat 08.01.2009, 23:39
Posts: 29175
Sand$: 54293
Donate
Location: SoCal
nyj.gif
Who is everyone?

_________________
Endzoneview Week 3 bets -
http://www.fantasysharks.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=321889&p=4492705#p4492705


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri 08.03.2012, 23:00 
Offline
Great White Shark
Great White Shark
User avatar

Joined: Thu 09.24.2009, 11:46
Posts: 7465
Sand$: 14271
Donate
I have a hard time trusting any NE RB.

Which is to say . . . I have a hard time trusting Bill.

_________________
12-tm PPR: QB/RB/3WR/2FLEX/TE/D-ST-PK FAAB

Cutler, Russell
LeSean, Pierre, Lamar, West, Hill, Starks
Alshon, Cruz, Cordy, Wallace, Cooks, Douglas, Latimer
Cameron, Niles
MIA

Keepers: Cordy, Cutler


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 08.04.2012, 00:13 
Offline
Megalodon
Megalodon
User avatar

Joined: Wed 09.06.2006, 19:30
Posts: 12184
Sand$: 11530
Donate
Location: Maine
ne.gif
Youre not missing anything, he is not THE GUY in NE, and his current ADP says to me to pass up on him right now and take value later on. NE is a passing team and Id say only 3 guys can be counted on for good production week in and week out at their ADP, that is Brady, Gronk, and Welker. Lloyd maybe as well given his ADP but he may be a stretch.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 08.04.2012, 00:15 
Offline
Mako Shark

Joined: Sun 08.17.2008, 10:39
Posts: 525
Sand$: 1878
Donate
dal.gif
Because he is an UBER-STUD, who is in for a MONSTER season!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 08.04.2012, 00:54 
Offline
Mako Shark

Joined: Wed 07.25.2012, 21:18
Posts: 633
Sand$: 1350
Donate
Its a little too high in my book by a few rounds as well. Its great to have an injury free back on your team but odds are this guy will not be a consistent producer of points.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 08.04.2012, 01:00 
Offline
SandShark

Joined: Sun 08.17.2003, 16:44
Posts: 85
Sand$: 172
Donate
Not that I would support taking Ridley in the fourth...

But BJGE put in 24 TD's over the past 2 years. That's nothing to ignore. If Bill decides the guy gets goal line carries, the guy will produce. Then again, I'm in a TD heavy league, so we're always looking for goal line backs.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 08.04.2012, 06:54 
Online
Megalodon
Megalodon
User avatar

Joined: Thu 12.21.2006, 15:58
Posts: 16157
Sand$: 8377
Donate
Location: Home of the Pittsburgh Steelers and 6 Super Bowls
pit.gif
This will turn into a chicken and egg discussion.

One school of thought will argue that Bill B doesn't use a bell-cow type of back in their "system". The last 5 years, only 1 time a RB has had 200 rushing attempts.

The other school of thought says that Bill B would use a bell cow back if he had one citing how productive A Smith or C Dillon was....which was a long time ago relatively speaking.

Ridley is the last option on passing plays, assuming he's even a designed option at all. A team with 60-70 RB receptions a year that throws as much as NEP must believe it has better options.

I don't see him having much value in PPR and don't see him getting 1K yards rushing so if you are drafting him in traditional scoring leagues, it has to be on your guess that he'll score 8-10 TD's.

The fact they use Hernandez and Woodhead running the ball tells me all I need to know about relying on an NEP RB.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 08.04.2012, 07:30 
Online
Great White Shark
Great White Shark
User avatar

Joined: Tue 08.28.2007, 14:37
Posts: 7634
Sand$: 18797
Donate
sd.gif
jesteva wrote:
This will turn into a chicken and egg discussion.

One school of thought will argue that Bill B doesn't use a bell-cow type of back in their "system". The last 5 years, only 1 time a RB has had 200 rushing attempts.

The other school of thought says that Bill B would use a bell cow back if he had one citing how productive A Smith or C Dillon was....which was a long time ago relatively speaking.

Ridley is the last option on passing plays, assuming he's even a designed option at all. A team with 60-70 RB receptions a year that throws as much as NEP must believe it has better options.

I don't see him having much value in PPR and don't see him getting 1K yards rushing so if you are drafting him in traditional scoring leagues, it has to be on your guess that he'll score 8-10 TD's.

The fact they use Hernandez and Woodhead running the ball tells me all I need to know about relying on an NEP RB.


Well put.

I'm not high on Ridley at all, won't be burning a pick on him unless he falls to me very, very far. Much rather pay a slightly higher price for a guy like Helu or Bradshaw. I'd even rather take Shonne Greene at a similar ADP.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 08.04.2012, 07:39 
Offline
Great White Shark
Great White Shark
User avatar

Joined: Thu 09.24.2009, 11:46
Posts: 7465
Sand$: 14271
Donate
Counting on TDs is a dangerous game.

Give me touches and yards, all day long.

_________________
12-tm PPR: QB/RB/3WR/2FLEX/TE/D-ST-PK FAAB

Cutler, Russell
LeSean, Pierre, Lamar, West, Hill, Starks
Alshon, Cruz, Cordy, Wallace, Cooks, Douglas, Latimer
Cameron, Niles
MIA

Keepers: Cordy, Cutler


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 08.04.2012, 07:49 
Online
Great White Shark
Great White Shark
User avatar

Joined: Tue 08.28.2007, 14:37
Posts: 7634
Sand$: 18797
Donate
sd.gif
TheNataliePortmans wrote:
Counting on TDs is a dangerous game.

Give me touches and yards, all day long.


Yep, far more consistent for the most part. Especially dangerous to do w/ a guy like Ridley... there are exceptions though. I've gotten quite a bit depending on TDs outta Brandon Jacobs @flex in years past


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat 08.04.2012, 08:28 
Offline
Whale Shark
User avatar

Joined: Fri 09.19.2008, 12:04
Posts: 1436
Sand$: 470
Donate
Location: NY
nyg.gif
crockett wrote:
Yes...he's one of the few remaining single starting RBs in a league that is swiftly converting to full fledged RBBC across the board. The fact that he will be THE guy carrying the ball for a very high powered offense makes him VERY valuable.


Danny Woodhead is still on the roster and will still get his.

The buzz on Ridley revolves around the thought that Shane Vereen won't make any noise, giving Ridley a decent amount of touches on an offense that puts up 30 points a game.

_________________
10team.5ppr
QB:Brees
RB:Charles,Vereen,Jennings,Spiller,S.Jackson,F.Jackson,Miller,Asiata
WR:Brown,Floyd,Wallace,Wright
TE:Olsen

10team ppr
QB:Wilson,Kaep
RB:McCoy,Foster,Jennings,Spiller,Asiata
WR:Green,Floyd,Cruz,Hilton
TE:Ertz


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: badgasman9, Bing [Bot], boottmills, clarky2120, DaKlute, devilben02, Dman05888, JayUnt, jesteva, jimbeer1, John McClane, msobral, NautArch, The Swagger, zepakman and 26 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group