FantasySharks.com

There are two types of Fantasy Football Owners: Sharks and Chum, which are you?
It is currently Fri 11.28.2014, 17:48

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon 05.07.2007, 21:35 
Offline
Megalodon
Megalodon

Joined: Wed 01.26.2005, 14:46
Posts: 20137
Sand$: 53858
Donate
Location: C/S, CO
ari.gif
I have four players I am mulling over for my keepers (3 max). Which would you keep?

RB Thomas Jones
RB Cedric Benson
RB Deuce McAllister
WR Andre Johnson

Other players I'm not considering as strongly: QB Marc Bulger; WR Plaxico Burress. If it matters ... in the draft I have these picks in the first 3 rounds:

1.06
1.07
1.09
2.04
2.07
3.06
3.12
Thanks.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon 05.07.2007, 21:45 
Offline
Megalodon
Megalodon
User avatar

Joined: Wed 12.07.2005, 14:23
Posts: 23900
Sand$: 35026
Donate
Location: Port-of-Spain
nyj.gif
JimHart wrote:
I have four players I am mulling over for my keepers (3 max). Which would you keep?

RB Thomas Jones
RB Cedric Benson
RB Deuce McAllister
WR Andre Johnson

Other players I'm not considering as strongly: QB Marc Bulger; WR Plaxico Burress. If it matters ... in the draft I have these picks in the first 3 rounds:

1.06
1.07
1.09
2.04
2.07
3.06
3.12
Thanks.


jim i would go with Andre Johnson, Thomas Jones and Benson

_________________
DISCLAIMER


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon 05.07.2007, 21:52 
Offline
Supreme Megalodon
Supreme Megalodon
User avatar

Joined: Mon 11.15.2004, 09:29
Posts: 27603
Sand$: 36594
Donate
Location: Dallas, TX
hou.gif
jetsman2806 wrote:
JimHart wrote:
I have four players I am mulling over for my keepers (3 max). Which would you keep?

RB Thomas Jones
RB Cedric Benson
RB Deuce McAllister
WR Andre Johnson

Other players I'm not considering as strongly: QB Marc Bulger; WR Plaxico Burress. If it matters ... in the draft I have these picks in the first 3 rounds:

1.06
1.07
1.09
2.04
2.07
3.06
3.12
Thanks.


jim i would go with Andre Johnson, Thomas Jones and Benson


Ditto, three solid keepers...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon 05.07.2007, 22:19 
Offline
Supreme Megalodon
Supreme Megalodon
User avatar

Joined: Fri 04.01.2005, 00:38
Posts: 29671
Sand$: 3520
Donate
Location: By the beach in NC
pit.gif
checo446 wrote:
jetsman2806 wrote:
JimHart wrote:
I have four players I am mulling over for my keepers (3 max). Which would you keep?

RB Thomas Jones
RB Cedric Benson
RB Deuce McAllister
WR Andre Johnson

Other players I'm not considering as strongly: QB Marc Bulger; WR Plaxico Burress. If it matters ... in the draft I have these picks in the first 3 rounds:

1.06
1.07
1.09
2.04
2.07
3.06
3.12
Thanks.


jim i would go with Andre Johnson, Thomas Jones and Benson


Ditto, three solid keepers...


yep

_________________
We don't swim in your toilet, don't crap in our tank.
Search before posting, and use the right forum


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue 05.08.2007, 09:46 
Offline
Megalodon
Megalodon

Joined: Wed 01.26.2005, 14:46
Posts: 20137
Sand$: 53858
Donate
Location: C/S, CO
ari.gif
If Deuce ends up being traded to a team needing an RB starter (e.g. Green Bay) would he become a more attractive keeper than Andre Johnson?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue 05.08.2007, 09:49 
Offline
Supreme Megalodon
Supreme Megalodon
User avatar

Joined: Fri 04.01.2005, 00:38
Posts: 29671
Sand$: 3520
Donate
Location: By the beach in NC
pit.gif
JimHart wrote:
If Deuce ends up being traded to a team needing an RB starter (e.g. Green Bay) would he become a more attractive keeper than Andre Johnson?


that's an interesting scenario. If he's the #1, then yes. If he's splitting carries, no

_________________
We don't swim in your toilet, don't crap in our tank.
Search before posting, and use the right forum


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue 05.08.2007, 10:01 
Offline
Supreme Megalodon
Supreme Megalodon
User avatar

Joined: Mon 11.15.2004, 09:29
Posts: 27603
Sand$: 36594
Donate
Location: Dallas, TX
hou.gif
The_Bus wrote:
JimHart wrote:
If Deuce ends up being traded to a team needing an RB starter (e.g. Green Bay) would he become a more attractive keeper than Andre Johnson?


that's an interesting scenario. If he's the #1, then yes. If he's splitting carries, no


Agreed, although the biased Texans fan in me would have a hard time giving up AJ back into the draft unless I had an early pick in the first to recapture him.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue 05.08.2007, 17:44 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Tue 10.21.2003, 10:56
Posts: 27180
Sand$: 3681
Donate
Location: Austin, TX
hou.gif
I said Jones, Deuce and Andre.

I don't believe in fairies, monsters or Cedric Benson.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue 05.08.2007, 19:04 
Offline
Megalodon
Megalodon

Joined: Wed 01.26.2005, 14:46
Posts: 20137
Sand$: 53858
Donate
Location: C/S, CO
ari.gif
Stankweasels 3000 wrote:
I said Jones, Deuce and Andre.

I don't believe in fairies, monsters or Cedric Benson.


I understand that some don't like Benson ... but can you really put a starting RB back in the draft pool? Especially in a Shark league?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue 05.08.2007, 19:40 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Tue 10.21.2003, 10:56
Posts: 27180
Sand$: 3681
Donate
Location: Austin, TX
hou.gif
JimHart wrote:
Stankweasels 3000 wrote:
I said Jones, Deuce and Andre.

I don't believe in fairies, monsters or Cedric Benson.


I understand that some don't like Benson ... but can you really put a starting RB back in the draft pool? Especially in a Shark league?


I sure as hell don't think I could put a WR like Andre Johnson in the pool. With a crappy David Carr and no running game last year, he was still awesome. They've got a less gunshy QB now and have upgraded the run game somewhat.

I think Andre's going to be bigger this season than last.

Cedric Benson has been a no-show, then a could-be, then an also-ran, then he hurt his knee in the Super Bowl.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed 05.09.2007, 16:37 
Offline
Chum
User avatar

Joined: Tue 11.21.2006, 13:07
Posts: 39
Sand$: 133
Donate
Location: Outside looking In
gb.gif
Schaub is what the texans needed.
Keep Johnson
T.Jones has a monster chip on his shoulder and will be the best back in NY for a couple years.
Keep T.Jones
CHI town is not going to get it done through Grossman, so I would go with Benson even though I don't trust his work ethic, durability and his team hates him.
Trade Benson for a better back/Keeper. I got Jacobs straight up for him in my league.

_________________
Sunnyvale Fantasy Trailerpark League
Team Steve French
5 player keepers
C.Palmer
LT,Gore,Jacobs
Colston


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed 05.09.2007, 23:26 
Offline
Megalodon
Megalodon

Joined: Wed 01.26.2005, 14:46
Posts: 20137
Sand$: 53858
Donate
Location: C/S, CO
ari.gif
chipsie34 wrote:
Schaub is what the texans needed.
Keep Johnson
T.Jones has a monster chip on his shoulder and will be the best back in NY for a couple years.
Keep T.Jones
CHI town is not going to get it done through Grossman, so I would go with Benson even though I don't trust his work ethic, durability and his team hates him.
Trade Benson for a better back/Keeper. I got Jacobs straight up for him in my league.


I would certainly consider trading Benson ... but trading him straight up for a RB like Brandon Jacobs just sounds like someone asking me to bend over. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu 05.10.2007, 09:57 
Offline
Great White Shark
Great White Shark

Joined: Mon 07.21.2003, 21:37
Posts: 7368
Sand$: 2323
Donate
Location: C.P., Ontario
nyg.gif
Gotta buck the trend here and go with the 3 rbs. You have 3 picks in the first round. Surely you can get some decent WRs with those three picks. What RBs are going to be left there? Figure that everyone keeps at least 2 RB with some going 3. Therefore you have 24-30 RBs kept plus the first 6 picks gone means up to 36 RBs gone before you pick.

Flip side: max WRs kept probably about 12. Therefore you get (at worst) WR 13,14,15 (all three if you want!). Gimme that before I get RB37

_________________
Tiki: Stop being such a jerk!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu 05.10.2007, 11:07 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri 07.07.2006, 10:59
Posts: 45391
Sand$: 100820
Donate
Location: The North Coast
cpstorm wrote:
Gotta buck the trend here and go with the 3 rbs. You have 3 picks in the first round. Surely you can get some decent WRs with those three picks. What RBs are going to be left there? Figure that everyone keeps at least 2 RB with some going 3. Therefore you have 24-30 RBs kept plus the first 6 picks gone means up to 36 RBs gone before you pick.

Flip side: max WRs kept probably about 12. Therefore you get (at worst) WR 13,14,15 (all three if you want!). Gimme that before I get RB37
...and here I thought I was the only one endorsing three RBs; my opinion is the same as before.

_________________
Follow me @mchamberlin32


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu 05.10.2007, 12:35 
Offline
Megalodon
Megalodon

Joined: Wed 01.26.2005, 14:46
Posts: 20137
Sand$: 53858
Donate
Location: C/S, CO
ari.gif
cpstorm wrote:
Gotta buck the trend here and go with the 3 rbs. You have 3 picks in the first round. Surely you can get some decent WRs with those three picks. What RBs are going to be left there? Figure that everyone keeps at least 2 RB with some going 3. Therefore you have 24-30 RBs kept plus the first 6 picks gone means up to 36 RBs gone before you pick.

Flip side: max WRs kept probably about 12. Therefore you get (at worst) WR 13,14,15 (all three if you want!). Gimme that before I get RB37


CP, you have just spoke sanity back into my questioning mind ... thank you. 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group