P. Riley or K. Burnett

Post Reply  
Chum
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Sep 4, 2007
Sand$: 8.00
First scoring:

Solo tackles 2 pt
Assiated tackles 1 pt
sacks 4 pts
Ints 4 pts
PD 1
FF or FR 3 pts

Starting D. Wahington at on LB spot

Can't get a bead on second starting spot

P.Riley vs NYJ or K.Burnett vs OAK- I see you have them both as studs this week. I have them ranked dead even. Who would you roll with?

Thanks for the respones
User avatar
Great White Shark
Posts: 3062
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004
Sand$: 7,720.96
Recommended Riley in a PM...BOY did I blow this one. :F
_______________________________________

Image

Follow IDPManor on Twitter!
Megalodon
Posts: 17320
Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009
Sand$: 22,123.04
Kilroy1872 wrote:Recommended Riley in a PM...BOY did I blow this one. :F

Wouldnt say you blew it ...

I think if you offered anyone 6 tackles (3 + 3) at the 2/3rds of the game played mark & with it being an ugly game in the trenches and the possibility of putting out a 4+4+ result tackle wise (solos + assists) perhaps more, i think alot of ppl would take punt :)

The Indy CB question? Different story - this one? Nah, definitely wouldnt say it was bad advice looking at the LB tackles so far in both games (All to play for in the capital right now and Fletch is currently on 7+8 for the afternoon so far. Dansby has 3 + 1 at time of posting) In fact i still think it holds up very well looking at the scoring, the games, the pattern of play AND the tackle opps :thumbright:

With the Phins staging a blowout win i doubt we see the raiders run much now as they play catchup f/ball and the tackle opps will start to dry up there unless youre playing any of the MIA DBs. Dont see Riley catching Burnett up w/a sack and an INT, but he should in all probability grab another tackle or two perhaps?

If it makes you feel any better i picked up Dejon as a flier - looks like i got shanhanaganed ... again. We really aught to know better :F ](*,)

EDIT: Final: Dansby + Burnett = (6+1 & 4+0 plus a sack and INT) vs Fletcher & Riley = (9+8 & 3+5). 29 solo + 6 assists for MIA vs 30 solo + 36 assists for WAS. DEFINITELY picked the right game for tackle opps
_______________________________________

Griff is a demi-god. That is all.
User avatar
Great White Shark
Posts: 3062
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004
Sand$: 7,720.96
jamcutpost wrote:
Kilroy1872 wrote:Recommended Riley in a PM...BOY did I blow this one. :F

Wouldnt say you blew it ...

I think if you offered anyone 6 tackles (3 + 3) at the 2/3rds of the game played mark & with it being an ugly game in the trenches and the possibility of putting out a 4+4+ result tackle wise (solos + assists) perhaps more, i think alot of ppl would take punt :)

The Indy CB question? Different story - this one? Nah, definitely wouldnt say it was bad advice looking at the LB tackles so far in both games (All to play for in the capital right now and Fletch is currently on 7+8 for the afternoon so far. Dansby has 3 + 1 at time of posting) In fact i still think it holds up very well looking at the scoring, the games, the pattern of play AND the tackle opps :thumbright:

With the Phins staging a blowout win i doubt we see the raiders run much now as they play catchup f/ball and the tackle opps will start to dry up there unless youre playing any of the MIA DBs. Dont see Riley catching Burnett up w/a sack and an INT, but he should in all probability grab another tackle or two perhaps?

If it makes you feel any better i picked up Dejon as a flier - looks like i got shanhanaganed ... again. We really aught to know better :F ](*,)

EDIT: Final: Dansby + Burnett = (6+1 & 4+0 plus a sack and INT) vs Fletcher & Riley = (9+8 & 3+5). 29 solo + 6 assists for MIA vs 30 solo + 36 assists for WAS. DEFINITELY picked the right game for tackle opps


I'll take a mulligan on Powers...he got hurt. ](*,)
_______________________________________

Image

Follow IDPManor on Twitter!
Chum
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Sep 4, 2007
Sand$: 8.00
Thanks for the response, It's hard to predict a pick six. Burnett scored 23 while Riley had 14. I won!
Megalodon
Posts: 17320
Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009
Sand$: 22,123.04
Kilroy1872 wrote:
jamcutpost wrote:
Kilroy1872 wrote:Recommended Riley in a PM...BOY did I blow this one. :F

Wouldnt say you blew it ...

I think if you offered anyone 6 tackles (3 + 3) at the 2/3rds of the game played mark & with it being an ugly game in the trenches and the possibility of putting out a 4+4+ result tackle wise (solos + assists) perhaps more, i think alot of ppl would take punt :)

The Indy CB question? Different story - this one? Nah, definitely wouldnt say it was bad advice looking at the LB tackles so far in both games (All to play for in the capital right now and Fletch is currently on 7+8 for the afternoon so far. Dansby has 3 + 1 at time of posting) In fact i still think it holds up very well looking at the scoring, the games, the pattern of play AND the tackle opps :thumbright:

With the Phins staging a blowout win i doubt we see the raiders run much now as they play catchup f/ball and the tackle opps will start to dry up there unless youre playing any of the MIA DBs. Dont see Riley catching Burnett up w/a sack and an INT, but he should in all probability grab another tackle or two perhaps?

If it makes you feel any better i picked up Dejon as a flier - looks like i got shanhanaganed ... again. We really aught to know better :F ](*,)

EDIT: Final: Dansby + Burnett = (6+1 & 4+0 plus a sack and INT) vs Fletcher & Riley = (9+8 & 3+5). 29 solo + 6 assists for MIA vs 30 solo + 36 assists for WAS. DEFINITELY picked the right game for tackle opps


I'll take a mulligan on Powers...he got hurt. ](*,)


I on the other hand have no defense for picking up Gomes ... Like we're surprised w/Shanhan lineup changes now or anything :D
_______________________________________

Griff is a demi-god. That is all.
User avatar
Great White Shark
Posts: 3062
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004
Sand$: 7,720.96
jamcutpost wrote:
Kilroy1872 wrote:
jamcutpost wrote:
Kilroy1872 wrote:Recommended Riley in a PM...BOY did I blow this one. :F

Wouldnt say you blew it ...

I think if you offered anyone 6 tackles (3 + 3) at the 2/3rds of the game played mark & with it being an ugly game in the trenches and the possibility of putting out a 4+4+ result tackle wise (solos + assists) perhaps more, i think alot of ppl would take punt :)

The Indy CB question? Different story - this one? Nah, definitely wouldnt say it was bad advice looking at the LB tackles so far in both games (All to play for in the capital right now and Fletch is currently on 7+8 for the afternoon so far. Dansby has 3 + 1 at time of posting) In fact i still think it holds up very well looking at the scoring, the games, the pattern of play AND the tackle opps :thumbright:

With the Phins staging a blowout win i doubt we see the raiders run much now as they play catchup f/ball and the tackle opps will start to dry up there unless youre playing any of the MIA DBs. Dont see Riley catching Burnett up w/a sack and an INT, but he should in all probability grab another tackle or two perhaps?

If it makes you feel any better i picked up Dejon as a flier - looks like i got shanhanaganed ... again. We really aught to know better :F ](*,)

EDIT: Final: Dansby + Burnett = (6+1 & 4+0 plus a sack and INT) vs Fletcher & Riley = (9+8 & 3+5). 29 solo + 6 assists for MIA vs 30 solo + 36 assists for WAS. DEFINITELY picked the right game for tackle opps


I'll take a mulligan on Powers...he got hurt. ](*,)


I on the other hand have no defense for picking up Gomes ... Like we're surprised w/Shanhan lineup changes now or anything :D


Shanihanigans! ](*,)

B***h of it is I could easily see it being the quicker Gomes this week against the Pats...or not.

Ten-Foot pole time. :party-smiley-050:
_______________________________________

Image

Follow IDPManor on Twitter!
User avatar
Whale Shark
Posts: 1367
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011
Sand$: 2,240.50
how about this week?
_______________________________________

16 Team PPR - IDP

Optimized Playoff Roster:
QB - Brees
RB - Forte
RB/WR - Oliver/Hunter/Crowell
WR - Julio
WR - Gordon
WR/TE - KBenj
TE - Kelce

6-1
Megalodon
Posts: 17320
Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009
Sand$: 22,123.04
cowanj2005 wrote:how about this week?

Riley vs Burnett? WAS vs NEP or PHI vs WAS?

Id still take Riley talent wise, but NEP aint exactly abundant in tackle opps except across the middle passes to receivers ...

If you put a gun to my head id go w/Riley - hes just been a lot more consistent as an LB2 than Burnett has. Not a great fan of the choices though!
_______________________________________

Griff is a demi-god. That is all.
User avatar
Whale Shark
Posts: 1367
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011
Sand$: 2,240.50
jamcutpost wrote:
cowanj2005 wrote:how about this week?

Riley vs Burnett? WAS vs NEP or PHI vs WAS?

Id still take Riley talent wise, but NEP aint exactly abundant in tackle opps except across the middle passes to receivers ...

If you put a gun to my head id go w/Riley - hes just been a lot more consistent as an LB2 than Burnett has. Not a great fan of the choices though!


haha.. yeah.. i asked before i looked at matchups... i went with hawthorne and mauluga instead.
_______________________________________

16 Team PPR - IDP

Optimized Playoff Roster:
QB - Brees
RB - Forte
RB/WR - Oliver/Hunter/Crowell
WR - Julio
WR - Gordon
WR/TE - KBenj
TE - Kelce

6-1
Megalodon
Posts: 17320
Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009
Sand$: 22,123.04
cowanj2005 wrote:
jamcutpost wrote:
cowanj2005 wrote:how about this week?

Riley vs Burnett? WAS vs NEP or PHI vs WAS?

Id still take Riley talent wise, but NEP aint exactly abundant in tackle opps except across the middle passes to receivers ...

If you put a gun to my head id go w/Riley - hes just been a lot more consistent as an LB2 than Burnett has. Not a great fan of the choices though!


haha.. yeah.. i asked before i looked at matchups... i went with hawthorne and mauluga instead.


:D
_______________________________________

Griff is a demi-god. That is all.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests