Team rating?

Post Reply  
Megalodon
Posts: 10275
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007
Sand$: 47,082.78
Drafted 12th, standard lineup/scoring:

QB: Cutler, Palmer
RB: McFadden, TRich, Stewart, Tate, Rodgers
WR: Cruz, Wallace, Maclin, VJax, D Moore
TE: T Gonzalez, Celek
K: who cares
DEF: weekly flyer
_______________________________________

The Raiders new solar system to power up their offense: DC to AC.
User avatar
Great White Shark
Posts: 4440
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008
Sand$: 1,252.70
You did good :thumbright:

Felt bad noone was responding
Megalodon
Posts: 10275
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007
Sand$: 47,082.78
Than you GM!

Obviously strength (perhaps too much) is WR. I feel as if I could have had a stronger starting QB/TE, and/or RB3 if I had balanced my needs a little better.
_______________________________________

The Raiders new solar system to power up their offense: DC to AC.
User avatar
Great White Shark
Posts: 4440
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008
Sand$: 1,252.70
R2000 wrote:Than you GM!

Obviously strength (perhaps too much) is WR. I feel as if I could have had a stronger starting QB/TE, and/or RB3 if I had balanced my needs a little better.

Well since you forgot to mention any of the info of your league it is hard to make these assumptions of your team needs. It seems you drafted a little like a homer though. [-X which is a no no.
Like everyone else I like Cutler but that is if B. Marshall can stay out of trouble and remain on the field. Very interested in what Palmer can do with an offseason. DMC has to remain healthy. T. Rich would have to perform sooner than later for you. I like Stewart in ppr leagues(not sure if your league is :wink: ). Tate has to wait till Foster to go down but will be a free agent in 2014. WRs are pretty solid and young so if this is a dynasty league you could be set for awhile. TEs not a fan. Gonzalez could still be decent this year but what does the future hold. I don't believe in Celek. I think you kicker will do just fine. Defense you will need a lucky coin and not be a homer here.
Megalodon
Posts: 10275
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007
Sand$: 47,082.78
This was a 12 team redraft mock. non-PPR, standard scoring/lineup.
_______________________________________

The Raiders new solar system to power up their offense: DC to AC.
User avatar
Great White Shark
Posts: 2966
Joined: Wed Sep 1, 2010
Sand$: 9,505.92
Wow. Love your WR situation. Your RBs are a itsy bit worrisome, but a ton of upside if everything works out. Really like getting Ben Tate as your RB4. Where were you picking in the draft and which round did you get guys? If that's possible to post.

Really curious as to where you got Cutler and VJax.
Megalodon
Posts: 10275
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007
Sand$: 47,082.78
pinksheets wrote:Wow. Love your WR situation. Your RBs are a itsy bit worrisome, but a ton of upside if everything works out. Really like getting Ben Tate as your RB4. Where were you picking in the draft and which round did you get guys? If that's possible to post.

Really curious as to where you got Cutler and VJax.


Again, this was a mock on FFC. :lol: Drafted 12 hole Just got bored, and wanted to try something different with RB/WR.

1. McFadden
2. TRich
3. Cruz
4. Wallace
5. VJax
6. Maclin (ignored RB3 and QB1, was looking at McGahee etc)
7. Tate (About 11-12 QBs in a major QB run)
8. Stewart (over Ingram/Wilson)
9. D Moore
10. Cutler
11.T Gonzalez
12. Rodgers
13. Palmer
14. Celek
_______________________________________

The Raiders new solar system to power up their offense: DC to AC.
User avatar
Megalodon
Posts: 17551
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008
Sand$: 73,959.38
Obviously McFadden and wallace are 2 biggest holes. McFadden stay healthy its good.
Blue Shark
Posts: 408
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2011
Sand$: 2,340.86
I like the team. You have some trade bait at WR, so could upgrade TE later on. You seem to know your weaknesses. I'm a big fan of DMC this year, but not Trich (just personal preference). You are weak at RB3 and probably should have grabbed one instead of WR. Anyways, I would say solid draft.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests