FantasySharks.com

There are two types of Fantasy Football Owners: Sharks and Chum, which are you?
It is currently Sun 12.21.2014, 10:51

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 63 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Rice vs Foster
PostPosted: Mon 08.06.2012, 19:20 
Offline
Blue Shark

Joined: Tue 08.23.2005, 17:27
Posts: 430
Sand$: 1072
Donate
Location: hfgh
oak.gif
Who would you take number one overall?

My league is non-PPR, but you can discuss either or for other readers of the board.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rice vs Foster
PostPosted: Mon 08.06.2012, 19:33 
Offline
Great White Shark
Great White Shark
User avatar

Joined: Sat 06.19.2010, 02:34
Posts: 4418
Sand$: 470
Donate
foster


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rice vs Foster
PostPosted: Mon 08.06.2012, 19:40 
Offline
SandShark
User avatar

Joined: Fri 07.22.2011, 11:58
Posts: 82
Sand$: 172
Donate
mia.gif
Foster, but make sure you get Tate! Foster more of a sure thing for TD's in the redone as Houston runs the ball quite a bit in the red zone. Cameron has a tendency to get cute w/ the playcalling in the redone at times, too smart for his own good.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rice vs Foster
PostPosted: Mon 08.06.2012, 19:42 
Offline
Great White Shark
Great White Shark
User avatar

Joined: Tue 08.28.2007, 14:37
Posts: 9773
Sand$: 21758
Donate
sd.gif
Foster non-PPR
Rice gets the slight edge PPR

Can't go wrong with either IMO


Last edited by TheChamp on Mon 08.06.2012, 19:43, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rice vs Foster
PostPosted: Mon 08.06.2012, 19:42 
Offline
Megalodon
Megalodon
User avatar

Joined: Fri 08.22.2008, 08:18
Posts: 14379
Sand$: 39708
Donate
Location: Taking beer from your fridge
pit.gif
I like rice the best, less room for error.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rice vs Foster
PostPosted: Mon 08.06.2012, 20:10 
Offline
Chum
User avatar

Joined: Sat 08.04.2012, 22:46
Posts: 29
Sand$: 74
Donate
det.gif
I like Foster, but I think Rice is the better option in PPR leagues. Also Foster has had a lot of miles the last couple years. Better get Tate if you go Foster.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rice vs Foster
PostPosted: Mon 08.06.2012, 20:13 
Offline
Great White Shark
Great White Shark
User avatar

Joined: Tue 08.18.2009, 23:49
Posts: 8483
Sand$: 17052
Donate
Location: United States
jax.gif
I would probably end up flipping a coin. Pros and cons to each one but you can't go wrong with either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rice vs Foster
PostPosted: Mon 08.06.2012, 20:18 
Offline
Great White Shark
Great White Shark
User avatar

Joined: Tue 09.02.2003, 01:09
Posts: 1658
Sand$: 4353
Donate
Location: in your head
sea.gif
yardlaw wrote:
Foster, but make sure you get Tate!


That is why I would go Rice.

_________________
There is only one strategy that works in Fantasy Football drafts:

The "Draft better than the other guys in your league" strategy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rice vs Foster
PostPosted: Mon 08.06.2012, 20:26 
Offline
Great White Shark
Great White Shark
User avatar

Joined: Thu 09.24.2009, 11:46
Posts: 9081
Sand$: 16015
Donate
rugger48 wrote:
I like rice the best, less room for error.


What does less room for error mean?

Anyway, last year, these two were just about dead even in PPR ppg.

I'd take Foster, but it's a coin flip.

_________________
12-tm PPR: QB/RB/3WR/2FLEX/TE/D-ST-PK [FAAB]

Stafford
Hill, Latavius, Sims, Hyde, PT
Alshon, DePunk, Martavis, Wallace, Davante, Hogan, Moncrief, Latimer
Rivera
DET, KCC

Lost to INJ: Cruz, Cooks, McKinnon


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rice vs Foster
PostPosted: Mon 08.06.2012, 20:28 
Offline
Great White Shark
Great White Shark
User avatar

Joined: Thu 09.24.2009, 11:46
Posts: 9081
Sand$: 16015
Donate
parshuter wrote:
I like Foster, but I think Rice is the better option in PPR leagues. Also Foster has had a lot of miles the last couple years. Better get Tate if you go Foster.


Just curious why you think that.

Foster is a fantastic receiver.

_________________
12-tm PPR: QB/RB/3WR/2FLEX/TE/D-ST-PK [FAAB]

Stafford
Hill, Latavius, Sims, Hyde, PT
Alshon, DePunk, Martavis, Wallace, Davante, Hogan, Moncrief, Latimer
Rivera
DET, KCC

Lost to INJ: Cruz, Cooks, McKinnon


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rice vs Foster
PostPosted: Mon 08.06.2012, 21:08 
Offline
Megalodon
Megalodon
User avatar

Joined: Fri 08.22.2008, 08:18
Posts: 14379
Sand$: 39708
Donate
Location: Taking beer from your fridge
pit.gif
TheNataliePortmans wrote:
rugger48 wrote:
I like rice the best, less room for error.


What does less room for error mean?

Anyway, last year, these two were just about dead even in PPR ppg.

I'd take Foster, but it's a coin flip.



less room for error means, they are coin flip right so look at what can prevent them from producing. The one thing that seperates the 2 of them is tate. Rice doesnt have a tate on his team. So I take rice. That doesnt mean I think tate will take from foster, but why not eliminate the possibility for sure and take rice.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rice vs Foster
PostPosted: Mon 08.06.2012, 21:23 
Online
Great White Shark
Great White Shark
User avatar

Joined: Sat 08.30.2008, 22:17
Posts: 2758
Sand$: 5558
Donate
rugger48 wrote:
TheNataliePortmans wrote:
rugger48 wrote:
I like rice the best, less room for error.


What does less room for error mean?

Anyway, last year, these two were just about dead even in PPR ppg.

I'd take Foster, but it's a coin flip.



less room for error means, they are coin flip right so look at what can prevent them from producing. The one thing that seperates the 2 of them is tate. Rice doesnt have a tate on his team. So I take rice. That doesnt mean I think tate will take from foster, but why not eliminate the possibility for sure and take rice.


but are you getting the upside of Tate if Foster goes down for a few games with whoever you would replace Rice with if he was to miss time?

_________________
Gridiron Post Whores Fantasy Football
Sharks Assassins
Los Cholos Escrotos
FantasySharks Bottom-Dweller League 13
Balls of Steel Dynasty League


Last edited by theoutlawdekepatton on Mon 08.06.2012, 21:58, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rice vs Foster
PostPosted: Mon 08.06.2012, 21:29 
Offline
Great White Shark
Great White Shark
User avatar

Joined: Sat 06.19.2010, 02:34
Posts: 4418
Sand$: 470
Donate
theoutlawdekepatton wrote:
rugger48 wrote:
TheNataliePortmans wrote:
rugger48 wrote:
I like rice the best, less room for error.


What does less room for error mean?

Anyway, last year, these two were just about dead even in PPR ppg.

I'd take Foster, but it's a coin flip.



less room for error means, they are coin flip right so look at what can prevent them from producing. The one thing that seperates the 2 of them is tate. Rice doesnt have a tate on his team. So I take rice. That doesnt mean I think tate will take from foster, but why not eliminate the possibility for sure and take rice.


but are you getting the upside of Tate is Foster goes down for a few games with whoever you would replace Rice with if he was to miss time?


that one rookie who runs like a girl


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rice vs Foster
PostPosted: Mon 08.06.2012, 21:30 
Offline
Great White Shark
Great White Shark
User avatar

Joined: Tue 08.28.2007, 14:37
Posts: 9773
Sand$: 21758
Donate
sd.gif
TheNataliePortmans wrote:
parshuter wrote:
I like Foster, but I think Rice is the better option in PPR leagues. Also Foster has had a lot of miles the last couple years. Better get Tate if you go Foster.


Just curious why you think that.

Foster is a fantastic receiver.


Yep, both are great pass catchers, but Rice will probably catch 10-15 more balls. It's a very slight edge IMO and you can't go wrong either way

I don't consider Tate a problem either like some suggest. The volume Houston uses its backs is great, and Tate allows Foster to stay refreshed throughout the game.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rice vs Foster
PostPosted: Mon 08.06.2012, 21:56 
Online
Great White Shark
Great White Shark
User avatar

Joined: Sat 08.30.2008, 22:17
Posts: 2758
Sand$: 5558
Donate
bjoemama2 wrote:
theoutlawdekepatton wrote:
rugger48 wrote:
TheNataliePortmans wrote:
rugger48 wrote:
I like rice the best, less room for error.


What does less room for error mean?

Anyway, last year, these two were just about dead even in PPR ppg.

I'd take Foster, but it's a coin flip.



less room for error means, they are coin flip right so look at what can prevent them from producing. The one thing that seperates the 2 of them is tate. Rice doesnt have a tate on his team. So I take rice. That doesnt mean I think tate will take from foster, but why not eliminate the possibility for sure and take rice.


but are you getting the upside of Tate is Foster goes down for a few games with whoever you would replace Rice with if he was to miss time?


that one rookie who runs like a girl


i was asking about upside, not upskirt :lol:

what i meant was, whoever you are drafting to take the RB bench spots, do they have the upside Tate can give you if your no.1 guy goes down.

_________________
Gridiron Post Whores Fantasy Football
Sharks Assassins
Los Cholos Escrotos
FantasySharks Bottom-Dweller League 13
Balls of Steel Dynasty League


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 63 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bama, Bing [Bot], bjaudzimas, bkind77, Griffimo, LawHog87, PlumDaddy, RotoMoto, Scaramanga, steeler39, Taglos, theoutlawdekepatton, vonbearsalot, Yahoo [Bot] and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group