Mako Shark
Posts: 526
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2008
Sand$: 1,880.26
What is taking Yahoo! so long to add Terrell Owens?
User avatar
Supreme Megalodon
Posts: 44863
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009
Sand$: 11,653.50
Why are you moving so quickly to pick him up?
User avatar
Megalodon
Posts: 19225
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008
Sand$: 71,786.90
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


somebody who works for Yahoo should be along soon to answer.


Wonder whose alias this is?
User avatar
Moderator
Posts: 35581
Joined: Sun Aug 2, 2009
Sand$: 5,144.27
Ask Yahoo
User avatar
Great White Shark
Posts: 2966
Joined: Wed Sep 1, 2010
Sand$: 9,505.92
Yahoo support staff has been too busy highfiving over TO's return to get on top of it. Probably need a few more hours at least.
User avatar
Supreme Megalodon
Posts: 27663
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2003
Sand$: 2,618.14
I am sure they are getting slammed right now. 'Where's TO? I must have him!' :lol:
_______________________________________

“If you are lucky in life, a man will come through your life that makes a difference. We had a rocky relationship, but I am glad I met him as I know I am better for knowing Tom Landry."
― Hollywood Henderson
User avatar
Great White Shark
Posts: 5540
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010
Sand$: 0.00
that team is a mess
User avatar
Megalodon
Posts: 17772
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008
Sand$: 20,022.16
for those that think TO is good for another 1k and 5-9 tds. Not this time his age will show worse then his bi-polar issues. man has been out of football basically 2 years, since 2005 Seahawks have had 1 thousand yard wr. With Hasselbeck in his prime. Bobby Engram.

like the vikes because we mirror each other were both shooting for rock bottom this year. With TO the hawks just took the lead.
_______________________________________

Image
User avatar
Moderator
Posts: 35581
Joined: Sun Aug 2, 2009
Sand$: 5,144.27
badgasman9 wrote:for those that think TO is good for another 1k and 5-9 tds. Not this time his age will show worse then his bi-polar issues. man has been out of football basically 2 years, since 2005 Seahawks have had 1 thousand yard wr. With Hasselbeck in his prime. Bobby Engram.

like the vikes because we mirror each other were both shooting for rock bottom this year. With TO the hawks just took the lead.


Good info badgas on Engram

I've always liked TO the fantasy player and I bought into both his Buffalo and Cincy stops, but even I'm not getting on this bus any more.
User avatar
Great White Shark
Posts: 2966
Joined: Wed Sep 1, 2010
Sand$: 9,505.92
badgasman9 wrote:for those that think TO is good for another 1k and 5-9 tds. Not this time his age will show worse then his bi-polar issues. man has been out of football basically 2 years, since 2005 Seahawks have had 1 thousand yard wr. With Hasselbeck in his prime. Bobby Engram.

like the vikes because we mirror each other were both shooting for rock bottom this year. With TO the hawks just took the lead.

No way the Hawks do worse than the Vikes. Like it or not, Hawks are on the rise with what could easily be a top 5 defense, a great run game, and potential improvement at QB.

I can't imagine anyone thinking the Hawks would be Vikings bad unless they aren't paying any attention to what's going on up here. The biggest weakness on team is by far the WR corps, and I have no worries about bringing in a TO who might not even make the team when we're looking at starting an UDFA from last year Ricardo Lockette or Golden Tate at split end.

That's by no means to suggest TO as a fantasy option, however.
User avatar
Megalodon
Posts: 11750
Joined: Sun Nov 7, 2004
Sand$: 53,593.04
All the seahawk haters in here... Clearly have no idea how good the defense is. Now I'm not the biggest fan of the TO signing but it is what it is. I see a team that will win 7-10 games this year depending on how Flynn and the WR's produce.

[-X
_______________________________________

Image Image
User avatar
Supreme Megalodon
Posts: 45684
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005
Sand$: 41,706.64
pinksheets wrote:
badgasman9 wrote:for those that think TO is good for another 1k and 5-9 tds. Not this time his age will show worse then his bi-polar issues. man has been out of football basically 2 years, since 2005 Seahawks have had 1 thousand yard wr. With Hasselbeck in his prime. Bobby Engram.

like the vikes because we mirror each other were both shooting for rock bottom this year. With TO the hawks just took the lead.

No way the Hawks do worse than the Vikes. Like it or not, Hawks are on the rise with what could easily be a top 5 defense, a great run game, and potential improvement at QB.

I can't imagine anyone thinking the Hawks would be Vikings bad unless they aren't paying any attention to what's going on up here. The biggest weakness on team is by far the WR corps, and I have no worries about bringing in a TO who might not even make the team when we're looking at starting an UDFA from last year Ricardo Lockette or Golden Tate at split end.

That's by no means to suggest TO as a fantasy option, however.


I'd be worried about TO being added to my favorite team. Mostly just as a locker-room PITA and annoying diva who has always seemed to care much more about his own stagetime than the performance of the team.
_______________________________________

34-17/ 29-7 / 34-13 / 27-17 / 31-17

2010 & 2011 Baseball National Champs

Cause if my eyes don't deceive me, there's something goin' wrong around here.
User avatar
Moderator
Posts: 35581
Joined: Sun Aug 2, 2009
Sand$: 5,144.27
Terrell Owens practiced at flanker after arriving to Seahawks training camp on Wednesday.
It's Sidney Rice's position, and a near-certain indication of the Seahawks' concern with the incumbent starter, who's coming back from several shoulder surgeries and concussions. Owens has been a split end his entire career, so it appears Seattle is moving him to replace Rice. Golden Tate is the Seahawks' split end. We tentatively expect those two to be the Week 1 starters


So many Owen's threads already, but this one's thread title is my favorite, so I choo-choo-choose it.
User avatar
Megalodon
Posts: 17772
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008
Sand$: 20,022.16
pinksheets wrote:
badgasman9 wrote:for those that think TO is good for another 1k and 5-9 tds. Not this time his age will show worse then his bi-polar issues. man has been out of football basically 2 years, since 2005 Seahawks have had 1 thousand yard wr. With Hasselbeck in his prime. Bobby Engram.

like the vikes because we mirror each other were both shooting for rock bottom this year. With TO the hawks just took the lead.

No way the Hawks do worse than the Vikes. Like it or not, Hawks are on the rise with what could easily be a top 5 defense, a great run game, and potential improvement at QB.

I can't imagine anyone thinking the Hawks would be Vikings bad unless they aren't paying any attention to what's going on up here. The biggest weakness on team is by far the WR corps, and I have no worries about bringing in a TO who might not even make the team when we're looking at starting an UDFA from last year Ricardo Lockette or Golden Tate at split end.

That's by no means to suggest TO as a fantasy option, however.



I agree on the defense I was refering to our offenses. Huge question marks at QB. Both have younger prospects that have had moments. Both have arrested RB's. Both O lines need repair. Then the biggy. We sign a pot dealing idiot. You guys sign a player who needs pots mellow. offensive rock bottom.
_______________________________________

Image
Great White Shark
Posts: 7401
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010
Sand$: 15,132.58
badgasman9 wrote:I agree on the defense I was refering to our offenses. Huge question marks at QB. Both have younger prospects that have had moments. Both have arrested RB's. Both O lines need repair. Then the biggy. We sign a pot dealing idiot. You guys sign a player who needs pots mellow. offensive rock bottom.

The difference is, they have hope.


Image

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests