FantasySharks.com

There are two types of Fantasy Football Owners: Sharks and Chum, which are you?
It is currently Sat 10.25.2014, 11:46

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 84 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri 08.17.2012, 04:29 
Offline
Chum

Joined: Fri 08.17.2012, 03:29
Posts: 19
Sand$: 76
Donate
I just registered tonight in order to see player projections based on my league's custom settings (standard decimal scoring, 1 pt/10 yards rush/rec, 1 pt/25 yards passing, 4/td). I wrote down all of the Shark's QB projections and compared them to three others sites' which I use and they came out a bit odd.

First off....over 400 pts for Ray Rice this season? That's fifty more points than any other site projects for their consensus #1 RB, Arian Foster.

Also in comparison to the other three sites, Sharks projected 14 quarterbacks to score at least THIRTY fewer points than the QBs lowest-projected score for each site. Example for RG3: Site one = 322, Site two = 289, Site three = 301, Sharks = 249.

Hopefully they'll update these projections...because Matt Ryan only scoring 5 more points than he did last season is absurd.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri 08.17.2012, 04:55 
Offline
Great White Shark
Great White Shark
User avatar

Joined: Sat 10.15.2005, 05:09
Posts: 4416
Sand$: 16342
Donate
Location: Psychoville and Ray Finkle's the Mayor (ATL)
atl.gif
Masd71 wrote:
I just registered tonight in order to see player projections based on my league's custom settings (standard decimal scoring, 1 pt/10 yards rush/rec, 1 pt/25 yards passing, 4/td). I wrote down all of the Shark's QB projections and compared them to three others sites' which I use and they came out a bit odd.

First off....over 400 pts for Ray Rice this season? That's fifty more points than any other site projects for their consensus #1 RB, Arian Foster.

Also in comparison to the other three sites, Sharks projected 14 quarterbacks to score at least THIRTY fewer points than the QBs lowest-projected score for each site. Example for RG3: Site one = 322, Site two = 289, Site three = 301, Sharks = 249.

Hopefully they'll update these projections...because Matt Ryan only scoring 5 more points than he did last season is absurd.


Well, I'd say stick with your "other" sites and don't let the door hit you on the way out. We happen to like it here.

_________________
$ PPR, start 1qb/2rb/2wr/te/1flex(rb-wr-te)/k/def
Rodgers, Wilson
Foster, CJ2k, Sankey, Robinson, Starks
Julio, Smith Sr., Wayne, Holmes
Walker/Reed
Gostkowski
PHI


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri 08.17.2012, 05:30 
Offline
Great White Shark
Great White Shark
User avatar

Joined: Sat 11.08.2003, 15:28
Posts: 8406
Sand$: 52
Donate
Location: Austin, TX
atl.gif
I think your doing the right thing by comparing and coming up with your own opinion... Well find out at the end of the year who was right... @DD... Easy big fella

_________________
imyourhuckleberry wrote:
So we let ole freak show midgley get on and throw out his 2 cents...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri 08.17.2012, 05:38 
Offline
Great White Shark
Great White Shark
User avatar

Joined: Sat 10.15.2005, 05:09
Posts: 4416
Sand$: 16342
Donate
Location: Psychoville and Ray Finkle's the Mayor (ATL)
atl.gif
tmidgley wrote:
I think your doing the right thing by comparing and coming up with your own opinion... Well find out at the end of the year who was right... @DD... Easy big fella

:thumbright:

_________________
$ PPR, start 1qb/2rb/2wr/te/1flex(rb-wr-te)/k/def
Rodgers, Wilson
Foster, CJ2k, Sankey, Robinson, Starks
Julio, Smith Sr., Wayne, Holmes
Walker/Reed
Gostkowski
PHI


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri 08.17.2012, 06:34 
Offline
Great White Shark
Great White Shark
User avatar

Joined: Fri 11.12.2004, 09:36
Posts: 7821
Sand$: 7929
Donate
jax.gif
Masd71 wrote:
I just registered tonight in order to see player projections based on my league's custom settings (standard decimal scoring, 1 pt/10 yards rush/rec, 1 pt/25 yards passing, 4/td). I wrote down all of the Shark's QB projections and compared them to three others sites' which I use and they came out a bit odd.

First off....over 400 pts for Ray Rice this season? That's fifty more points than any other site projects for their consensus #1 RB, Arian Foster.

Also in comparison to the other three sites, Sharks projected 14 quarterbacks to score at least THIRTY fewer points than the QBs lowest-projected score for each site. Example for RG3: Site one = 322, Site two = 289, Site three = 301, Sharks = 249.

Hopefully they'll update these projections...because Matt Ryan only scoring 5 more points than he did last season is absurd.



Try a FF magazine. I hear they are the most accurate.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri 08.17.2012, 06:58 
Offline
Great White Shark
Great White Shark
User avatar

Joined: Thu 07.29.2010, 21:00
Posts: 2048
Sand$: 3043
Donate
Location: Dirty Jersey
nyg.gif
Still not sure what your are concerned about....you're concerned that you don't agree?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri 08.17.2012, 07:08 
Offline
Great White Shark
Great White Shark
User avatar

Joined: Wed 07.14.2010, 06:11
Posts: 5415
Sand$: 25827
Donate
Location: Between Scylla and Charybdis
cle.gif
Masd71 wrote:
I just registered tonight in order to see player projections based on my league's custom settings (standard decimal scoring, 1 pt/10 yards rush/rec, 1 pt/25 yards passing, 4/td). I wrote down all of the Shark's QB projections and compared them to three others sites' which I use and they came out a bit odd.

First off....over 400 pts for Ray Rice this season? That's fifty more points than any other site projects for their consensus #1 RB, Arian Foster.

Also in comparison to the other three sites, Sharks projected 14 quarterbacks to score at least THIRTY fewer points than the QBs lowest-projected score for each site. Example for RG3: Site one = 322, Site two = 289, Site three = 301, Sharks = 249.

Hopefully they'll update these projections...because Matt Ryan only scoring 5 more points than he did last season is absurd.


Masd71--Welcome to the Tank. Enjoy your swim!

IMO, the Tank projections are --like ALL projections--simply opinions and need to be weighed as part of an overall ranking. The true strength of the Tank is in the forums. A lot of these guys are extremely knowledgeable and can provide you with a real advantage in playing this game we all love.

_________________
In remembrance of Walter, D-Day veteran and my friend. Never forget.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri 08.17.2012, 07:30 
Offline
Great White Shark
Great White Shark
User avatar

Joined: Tue 10.14.2003, 13:43
Posts: 3652
Sand$: 7678
Donate
Location: Washington, PA
pit.gif
What he said ^^^^

Projections are just that....They are conjecture. Use them as a tool, not the end-all, be-all. If you look at projections as the bible you will not do well in ANY draft.

Welcome to the tank.

_________________
2014 Hammerhead 4
Bottom Dweller 29
K/Def Challenge http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com/f1/1106643

RIP Bro....
Image
7-14-2011


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri 08.17.2012, 07:55 
Offline
Tiger Shark

Joined: Tue 09.09.2003, 08:12
Posts: 221
Sand$: 558
Donate
chi.gif
bluemist wrote:
Masd71 wrote:
I just registered tonight in order to see player projections based on my league's custom settings (standard decimal scoring, 1 pt/10 yards rush/rec, 1 pt/25 yards passing, 4/td). I wrote down all of the Shark's QB projections and compared them to three others sites' which I use and they came out a bit odd.

First off....over 400 pts for Ray Rice this season? That's fifty more points than any other site projects for their consensus #1 RB, Arian Foster.

Also in comparison to the other three sites, Sharks projected 14 quarterbacks to score at least THIRTY fewer points than the QBs lowest-projected score for each site. Example for RG3: Site one = 322, Site two = 289, Site three = 301, Sharks = 249.

Hopefully they'll update these projections...because Matt Ryan only scoring 5 more points than he did last season is absurd.


Masd71--Welcome to the Tank. Enjoy your swim!

IMO, the Tank projections are --like ALL projections--simply opinions and need to be weighed as part of an overall ranking. The true strength of the Tank is in the forums. A lot of these guys are extremely knowledgeable and can provide you with a real advantage in playing this game we all love.



The articles and projections, etc are nice here....but this is by FAR the best forum I'm a part of....the info you can gather here is valuable and the discussions (while sometimes grade school name calling) are usually well argued.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri 08.17.2012, 08:07 
Offline
Great White Shark
Great White Shark

Joined: Mon 08.30.2010, 22:25
Posts: 2674
Sand$: 5042
Donate
kc.gif
Projections are not the strength of this site.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri 08.17.2012, 08:27 
Offline
Supreme Megalodon
Supreme Megalodon
User avatar

Joined: Sun 09.11.2005, 10:42
Posts: 38862
Sand$: 36536
Donate
Location: Rock Hill, SC
car.gif
First off, you wrote them down? What year is this? :lol:

They're PROJECTIONS. That means they are OPINIONS. Do your own and also please post them now so that you can be graded later.

I can absolutely guarantee you that the ones here won't be 100% right. Heck, they probably won't be 66.67% right. But you need to take these types of things and walk through and adjust them to fit your OPINIONS. Take off the training wheels and pedal.

Welcome to the tank and yes, get off my lawn. :wink:

_________________
34-17/ 29-7 / 34-13 / 27-17 / 31-17

2010 & 2011 Baseball National Champs

I was the smartest person I knew, certainly I had wherewithal to unravel the mysteries that lay at the heart of a moron.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri 08.17.2012, 08:28 
Offline
Supreme Megalodon
Supreme Megalodon
User avatar

Joined: Sun 09.11.2005, 10:42
Posts: 38862
Sand$: 36536
Donate
Location: Rock Hill, SC
car.gif
hawkdogger wrote:
Projections are not the strength of this site.


And feel free to post the right ones. I'd appreciate that. And how about the Pick 3 numbers for today also, k?

_________________
34-17/ 29-7 / 34-13 / 27-17 / 31-17

2010 & 2011 Baseball National Champs

I was the smartest person I knew, certainly I had wherewithal to unravel the mysteries that lay at the heart of a moron.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri 08.17.2012, 08:32 
Offline
Whale Shark
User avatar

Joined: Sat 08.21.2010, 03:03
Posts: 1378
Sand$: 1450
Donate
Location: stuck in the past
mia.gif
ironmonkey78 wrote:
bluemist wrote:
Masd71 wrote:
I just registered tonight in order to see player projections based on my league's custom settings (standard decimal scoring, 1 pt/10 yards rush/rec, 1 pt/25 yards passing, 4/td). I wrote down all of the Shark's QB projections and compared them to three others sites' which I use and they came out a bit odd.

First off....over 400 pts for Ray Rice this season? That's fifty more points than any other site projects for their consensus #1 RB, Arian Foster.

Also in comparison to the other three sites, Sharks projected 14 quarterbacks to score at least THIRTY fewer points than the QBs lowest-projected score for each site. Example for RG3: Site one = 322, Site two = 289, Site three = 301, Sharks = 249.

Hopefully they'll update these projections...because Matt Ryan only scoring 5 more points than he did last season is absurd.


Masd71--Welcome to the Tank. Enjoy your swim!

IMO, the Tank projections are --like ALL projections--simply opinions and need to be weighed as part of an overall ranking. The true strength of the Tank is in the forums. A lot of these guys are extremely knowledgeable and can provide you with a real advantage in playing this game we all love.



The articles and projections, etc are nice here....but this is by FAR the best forum I'm a part of....the info you can gather here is valuable and the discussions (while sometimes grade school name calling) are usually well argued.


Long live the forums!!! I came here first for the projections too but I agree the forums are the strength. Well that and the Shark Leagues.

Careful though some of our brother sharks DO bite, not in a good way either, but most are harmless.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri 08.17.2012, 08:49 
Offline
Mako Shark

Joined: Sun 08.07.2011, 11:11
Posts: 531
Sand$: 1266
Donate
Location: Wilmington, NC
car.gif
You can always go with Mathew Berry and Tim Hasselbacks projections instead, was watching them last night and boy do they know their stuff.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri 08.17.2012, 08:52 
Offline
Great White Shark
Great White Shark
User avatar

Joined: Fri 11.12.2004, 09:36
Posts: 7821
Sand$: 7929
Donate
jax.gif
Dutchmaster17 wrote:
You can always go with Mathew Berry and Tim Hasselbacks projections instead, was watching them last night and boy do they know their stuff.



Berry is only one worth 2 shoots FF wise over at that place.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 84 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: boredguy, Google [Bot], icemen55, littlejim, rsr1, rugger48, xxjokerxx, zindog and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group