FantasySharks.com

There are two types of Fantasy Football Owners: Sharks and Chum, which are you?
It is currently Mon 12.29.2014, 00:16

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun 09.02.2012, 13:14 
Offline
Great White Shark
Great White Shark
User avatar

Joined: Sun 07.13.2003, 22:35
Posts: 2015
Sand$: 4662
Donate
Location: GA Aquarium
atl.gif
I just finished an ESPN 12-team mock draft. I picked in the 12 spot. (My real draft is tonight and I have the same 12 spot.)

Here are the results;

1:12 - Stafford QB
2:1 - Graham TE
3:12 - TRichardson RB
4:1 - Jordy Nelson WR
5:12 - DeSean Jackson WR
6:1 - S Ridley RB
7:12- Titus Young WR
8:1 - Michael Bush RB
9:12- Michael Floyd WR
10:1 - Pierre Thomas RB
11:12- Kendall Wright WR
12:1 - Tiawan Jones RB
13:12 - Brandon LaFell WR
14:1 - Jacquizz Rodgers RB
15:12 - Hanson K
16:1 - Buffalo DEF

I solidified my QB & TE spots but waiting till my turn again found me watching top RB/WR talent going off the board. Do you think its worth grabbing a top QB/TE with the first 2 picks if they are stud players and the struggle to get quality at the other positions? Is there enough talent to hold off on a TE like Graham and grab a top RB instead. This draft has my #1 RB as Richardson. That scares me.

What do you guys think?

_________________
QB- Ryan
RB - Ingram, Asiata, Herron, Kerwynn Williams, J. Randle
WR - Julio, D. Thomas, M. Evans, Martavis Bryant, Landry, Marquess Wilson, Charles Johnson
TE - Kelce
DEF - STL
K- Bullock


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun 09.02.2012, 13:27 
Offline
SandShark

Joined: Mon 09.12.2011, 16:34
Posts: 74
Sand$: 232
Donate
Virtually every team I've seen take a stud QB then graham or gronk in the second have had a deficiency in WR or RB or both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun 09.02.2012, 13:48 
Offline
Mako Shark
User avatar

Joined: Tue 10.11.2011, 02:50
Posts: 657
Sand$: 1677
Donate
harrypalmer wrote:
Virtually every team I've seen take a stud QB then graham or gronk in the second have had a deficiency in WR or RB or both.


Yes. Horrible draft IMO

_________________
INTRODUCING "THE UNIT"

QB: Brady

RB: McCoy, Charles, Tate, McKinnon

WR: Gordon, A. Brown, Patterson, Cooks, Quick

TE: Ertz

DEF: 49ers

K: Novak

10 Team 0.5 PPR


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun 09.02.2012, 13:51 
Offline
Great White Shark
Great White Shark
User avatar

Joined: Mon 08.16.2004, 17:56
Posts: 6343
Sand$: 45094
Donate
Location: Michigan
det.gif
I think it's ok to go QB OR TE early, but not both.

_________________
2014 Leagues

Bottom-Dweller 6 Shark League 5-8 Missed
Deep Black Dynasty 11-2 First Round Bye
Work $ League 3-10 Missed
Homer $$ League 6-7 Missed


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun 09.02.2012, 13:54 
Offline
Mako Shark
User avatar

Joined: Tue 10.11.2011, 02:50
Posts: 657
Sand$: 1677
Donate
I'd go RB, RB or RB, WR. There's plenty of QBs that will still be available. Maybe not Stafford but Romo, Cutler, Schaub, Vick or Rivers who could all have great seasons.

And there's plenty of TE sleepers that can help you out. Your banking on Gronk and Graham having seasons like last year which may not happen. Guys like Hernandez, Olsen, Tamme/Dreesen and others will have some kind of value.

That is the route I would go considering your draft results.

_________________
INTRODUCING "THE UNIT"

QB: Brady

RB: McCoy, Charles, Tate, McKinnon

WR: Gordon, A. Brown, Patterson, Cooks, Quick

TE: Ertz

DEF: 49ers

K: Novak

10 Team 0.5 PPR


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun 09.02.2012, 14:00 
Offline
Great White Shark
Great White Shark

Joined: Thu 08.28.2008, 10:16
Posts: 1565
Sand$: 4012
Donate
Location: Austin, TX
dal.gif
Do a search, man:

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=287319&start=60

_________________
12-team / non-PPR / 5 pt passing TD
"Dumpster Fire"
QB: T. Romo
WR: A. Brown, G. Tate, M. Sanu, K. Allen, Stills
RB: J. Bell, J. Hill, McKinnon, Tre Mason
TE: M. Rivera
DEF: Buffalo, Indy
K: Parkey


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun 09.02.2012, 15:15 
Offline
Great White Shark
Great White Shark
User avatar

Joined: Tue 09.06.2011, 11:56
Posts: 1665
Sand$: 2816
Donate
phi.gif
nosman21 wrote:

This. There have been about a dozen of these threads in the last week or so alone it seems.

_________________
Bottom-Dweller League 34 9-2
QB Stafford, Rivers
RB Gio, Bell, Denard, L Murray, Herron
WR Wallace, G Tate, Martavis, Mi Floyd, Shorts
TE Julius, Fleener
K Dawson
DEF DEN

Griffmo wrote:
the allure of the unknown potential vs the available mediocrity


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun 09.02.2012, 16:17 
Offline
Great White Shark
Great White Shark
User avatar

Joined: Thu 09.24.2009, 11:46
Posts: 9161
Sand$: 16179
Donate
mudhen wrote:
I think it's ok to go QB OR TE early, but not both.


Agree. And the QB is my choice between the two.

You must get at least one RB at the top.

Trent and Ridley as your top-2 RBs.

Scary.

And you don't need to draft guys like Floyd and Taiwan. They have virtually zero value right now.

_________________
12-tm PPR: QB/RB/3WR/2FLEX/TE/D-ST-PK [FAAB]

Stafford
Hill, Latavius, Sims, Hyde, PT
Alshon, DePunk, Martavis, Wallace, Davante, Hogan, Moncrief, Latimer
Rivera
DET, KCC

Lost to INJ: Cruz, Cooks, McKinnon


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun 09.02.2012, 21:02 
Offline
Chum

Joined: Sun 10.10.2010, 06:51
Posts: 14
Sand$: 72
Donate
The guy who had 12th pick in 12 team league went with Newton and Graham.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun 09.02.2012, 21:03 
Offline
Great White Shark
Great White Shark
User avatar

Joined: Tue 08.28.2007, 14:37
Posts: 9783
Sand$: 21780
Donate
sd.gif
Edited: Steven Ridley as RB2, Michael Bush as RB3. Not a great situation

Do you have a flex? If so, I'd be frantically looking for a RB upgrade (and probably w/o a flex too)

PS I never understand why people bother posting draft results, etc, w/o posting league rules and roster spots... it's impossible to judge how good your roster is w/o knowing the details. PPR? 2QB? 2 RB? Flex? 4pt TDs? 6 pt TDs? See how much can change how your roster looks? :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun 09.02.2012, 21:09 
Offline
Blue Shark
User avatar

Joined: Tue 08.05.2003, 10:33
Posts: 341
Sand$: 870
Donate
Location: Washington DC
dal.gif
That's one mock draft result. I didn't even know ESPN did mocks, but even if they do, I wouldn't put a lot of trust in them.

Still, the results are telling. You take VBD to an extreme if you don't get starters that merit starting at the key positions. i'd go WR-WR before i went QB-TE. Not recommending either as a course of action, just saying.

_________________
Once, I found $20. Now, I pretty much live in the afterglow.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon 09.03.2012, 07:40 
Offline
Great White Shark
Great White Shark
User avatar

Joined: Wed 09.20.2006, 13:40
Posts: 6045
Sand$: 6787
Donate
chi.gif
I'd rather take Gates in the 3rd or 4th and get a quality RB, RB or RB, WR in the first two rounds. Quality QBs available later as well, to reiterate what others are saying.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon 09.03.2012, 09:09 
Offline
Chum

Joined: Thu 08.04.2011, 09:33
Posts: 3
Sand$: 14
Donate
Not a fan of going QB early. I know the "Experts" say taking a stud is a easy way of making it to the playoffs but you leave your team thin at WR and RB in regards to depth.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], Exabot [Bot], Lasher1225, SnakeStabler and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group