Strength of schedule is calculated from the opponents projected fantasy points allowed for the QB position. The best rating is +16 which gives the player the advantage against the defense and indicates an easy opponent, the worst rating is -16 which gives the defense the advantage and indicates a tough opponent.
Which Matt Hasselbeck will show up in 2009? He had career bests in 2007 and then the injury riddled nightmare of 2008. It's easy to think he will improve over last year but should fall well short of 2007. He will be 34 at the beginning of the season, has a new head coach, and a new number one receiver to work with. He makes for a nice #2 QB with an occasional start if the matchup is favorable.
What do we need to address most drastically this offseason?
O-Line: Walter Jones is old, and we need a LT to replace him.
QB: Hass is getting old too, and much as I love Seneca, I don't see him as the QB of the future.
RB: Forsett has shown ...
Which, if any, part of the Seahawks offense can we bank on next year? Does Forsett become must draft material? How about Housh or Burleson? Discuss!...
Does not seemto be alot of you. thats cool, whn you find me let me know your out there....
*The above views are not necessarily endorsed or approved by FantasySharks
2005 Draft Central
Average Draft Position (ADP) Tracker
Draft Analysis
Round 8, Pick 12
Positives Great QB who can put up big numbers. Having Alexander helps take some pressure off. Negatives His receiving corps is limited. I'm not concerned about Robinson leaving....he was just bad news. Draft Strategy I was hoping to get Delhomme, but am happy with this pick. (Contributed by: bgarske)
Round 7, Pick 4
Positives There's nothing flashy about Hasselbeck's game, most rankings have him just inside the top 10 at his position. He's proven to be a steady performer in the past and he will be the starter in Seattle. Negatives A bit of a disappointment last year, though he could have been a victim of too high expectations. Should do well in 2005. Draft Strategy With 3RBs and 3WRs already on the squad and 16 selections between this pick and my next, made total sense to grab one of the few remaining top-10 quarterbacks. No way he makes it back to me and the prospects at the other positions (RB and WR) are not great. No sense in bulking up too much at one position when I can do well at another. (Contributed by: doug_coutts)
Round 6, Pick 3
Positives Hasselbeck's numbers took a slight dip last season thanks to missing two games, but he still threw for 22 TDs to 15 INTs including three 300-yard passing games. Without Koren Robinson's distractions, Hasselbeck should perform at a high level once again surpassing his numbers from last season. Negatives Has Hasselbeck ever been the same since his Lambeau Field failed prediction? The INTs are a bit disturbing and Shaun Alexander steals a ton of offense, but when Hass is on his game, he's tough to stop. Draft Strategy The QBs left on the board were Hass, Plummer (who I just don't like), Brooks, Palmer, Delhomme, etc. Not exactly choosing between Manning and Culpepper. My debate was between Hass and Palmer and I gave the edge to Hass simply because he has done it before. I think Palmer will make Chingala proud, but I'm hoping Hass is the magna to Palmer's cum laude. (Contributed by: Ron_Anish)
Facebook
Twitter
