Kaepernick Workout

Post Reply  
User avatar
Great White Shark
Posts: 7215
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010
Sand$: 26,686.08
It literally took me two minutes to analyze it.
It’s very standard.
I’d look at it first then say it’s ok or not.[/quote]
Sure, because you have nothing at stake.[/quote]

I don’t know what you mean by that.
If I’m advising a client I have his interests at stake.
And it wouldn’t take any lawyer more than a quick look to see if there was a problem. Which I don’t see.
It’s not a tricky legal issue.
User avatar
Supreme Megalodon
Posts: 63614
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009
Sand$: 35,079.04
hawkdogger wrote:
I don’t know what you mean by that.
If I’m advising a client I have his interests at stake.
And it wouldn’t take any lawyer more than a quick look to see if there was a problem. Which I don’t see.
It’s not a tricky legal issue.

I meant you don't currently have anything at stake by hypothetically advising him.
User avatar
Great White Shark
Posts: 7215
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010
Sand$: 26,686.08
Elmagister wrote:
hawkdogger wrote:
I don’t know what you mean by that.
If I’m advising a client I have his interests at stake.
And it wouldn’t take any lawyer more than a quick look to see if there was a problem. Which I don’t see.
It’s not a tricky legal issue.

I meant you don't currently have anything at stake by hypothetically advising him.


Ok. That doesn’t change my legal analysis.
User avatar
Great White Shark
Posts: 7215
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010
Sand$: 26,686.08
https://apple.news/AHkQUBT1NTKOIobu55SwA5w
Here’s an interesting WSJ article on it.
User avatar
Great White Shark
Posts: 8863
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005
Sand$: 8,893.21
hawkdogger wrote:https://apple.news/AHkQUBT1NTKOIobu55SwA5w
Here’s an interesting WSJ article on it.


So... it’s a pretty standard waiver but Kap’s team says he’s special so should get a special waiver?
_______________________________________

Follow me on Tumblr http://jd666.tumblr.com
2019 LOT “The Resurrected One”
2015 LOT Norse League Champion
Image
User avatar
Supreme Megalodon
Posts: 63614
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009
Sand$: 35,079.04
canadianraiderfan wrote:
hawkdogger wrote:https://apple.news/AHkQUBT1NTKOIobu55SwA5w
Here’s an interesting WSJ article on it.


So... it’s a pretty standard waiver but Kap’s team says he’s special so should get a special waiver?

Great unbiased take.
User avatar
Great White Shark
Posts: 9697
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010
Sand$: 20,373.46
hawkdogger wrote:https://apple.news/AHkQUBT1NTKOIobu55SwA5w
Here’s an interesting WSJ article on it.
Hit a paywall and I can't open it. Can you summarize?
_______________________________________

In remembrance of Walter, D-Day veteran and my friend. Never forget.
User avatar
Great White Shark
Posts: 9697
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010
Sand$: 20,373.46
BTW, I will recommend you for others needing sound sands advice.
_______________________________________

In remembrance of Walter, D-Day veteran and my friend. Never forget.
User avatar
Great White Shark
Posts: 7215
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010
Sand$: 26,686.08
bluemist wrote:
hawkdogger wrote:https://apple.news/AHkQUBT1NTKOIobu55SwA5w
Here’s an interesting WSJ article on it.
Hit a paywall and I can't open it. Can you summarize?


Kaps lawyer thinks it’s a substantive difference. The nfl doesn’t.

Shocking.