RB: Sanders, Chubb, Ekeler, Edmonds, Hill
WR: Robinson, Ridley, Lamb, Gage, Beasley, Samuel
TE: Schultz, Akins
1/2 PPR: Would you trade Chubb or Ekeler for Kelce? I'm kind of thinking yes, and Chubb being the guy. What do you guys think?
BG3eb wrote:RB: Sanders, Chubb, Ekeler, Edmonds, Hill
WR: Robinson, Ridley, Lamb, Gage, Beasley, Samuel
TE: Schultz, Akins
1/2 PPR: Would you trade Chubb or Ekeler for Kelce? I'm kind of thinking yes, and Chubb being the guy. What do you guys think?
BG3eb wrote:I guess my thought process is that the Browns are about to hits some negative game scripts and that's going to hurt Chubb. Seems like the Chargers are going to be up and down now so that keeps Ekeler in the mix. May be best just to keep them lol.
hard 10 wrote:BG3eb wrote:I guess my thought process is that the Browns are about to hits some negative game scripts and that's going to hurt Chubb. Seems like the Chargers are going to be up and down now so that keeps Ekeler in the mix. May be best just to keep them lol.
I think Chubb will continue to roll, and I like him as a good RB1 most weeks (and Hunt as a good RB2). I'm not worried about Ekeler, but if I had to choose one to keep, it would be Chubb.
With that said, Schultz will be a solid TE and regular red zone threat, and I wouldn't be in a hurry to trade either guy for an upgrade at TE.
ubertaco wrote:Well, I'm pretty down on the 49ers offense generally, I suppose I may be too harsh on Deebo, but I guess we should assume he is fully recovered and while it might be another week for him to get fully reintegrated, if he looks like he did, and his usage is similar he's better than bench filler.
I'd still rather roll out Montgomery though, but it might be closer than I'm giving credit for. Gaskin is too much of an unknown for me, but again, I might be undervaluing him as well. I don't know what to make of the Dolphins generally, the one game I watched Gaskin looked like the guy who was getting the touches but didn't impress me hugely as anything more than JAG.
I dunno, that trade is reasonable, just wanted to go deeper on it I guess.
I like it.jstr2112 wrote:might have paid too much in shorting my bench, but traded OBJ, RoJo, and Gallup, for D Adams
bench is now J Taylor, B. Hill, Hardman, Claypool and hopefully change Snell into Chark
bluemist wrote:I like it.jstr2112 wrote:might have paid too much in shorting my bench, but traded OBJ, RoJo, and Gallup, for D Adams
bench is now J Taylor, B. Hill, Hardman, Claypool and hopefully change Snell into Chark
Gilgamesh wrote:What do think it would take to get Antonio Gibson right now?
It was a strange draft this year -- 14 team, 0.5 PPR, short bench. I took Zeke as #3 off the board, then everyone went RB crazy.
The team with Gibson has:
RB: Miles Sanders, Mixon, Gibson, Edmunds, Martinson, and Zack Moss
WR: Stefon Diggs and Allen Robinson
I have:
RB: Zeke, David Montgomery, Latavius Murray, and J.K. Dobbins
WR: Nuk Hopkins, Tyreek Hill, OBJ, and Tyler Boyd
We play 2 RB, 2 WR, and a RB/WR flex.
Clearly I'm hurting at RB, but everyone hurts somewhere in a big enough league.
May be willing to offer Boyd for Gibson. Maybe Boyd and Murray for Gibson and Edmunds, or just Gibson. Am I in the ballpark?
Seems crazy to try to go with only two WRs, but he's dodged injuries so far. Boyd seems like Burrow's top target, so I don't see it as a chump deal. Maybe I'm better off hanging onto Boyd a while longer...
yecul wrote:Thoughts on this one in standard?
Give: Woods, Swift
Get: Chark, Moss
We play 2 Wr and I have DK, Golladay, so both WRa are my 3rd option who I'd typically flex. The RBs are 4th in line upside plays.
Gilgamesh wrote:What kind of WR do you think a fellow could get for OBJ. Naturally, if you find someone stupid enough, all things are possible. I'm just scratching my head, trying to think of an offer that I can make and not get auto-rejected.
Two things seem to work against me. One is that people in many leagues undervalue WRs. This is a 0.5 PPR league, but even in full PPR, it's hard to make a deal if you're not offering a RB.
The other thing is a lot of the Monday morning articles are touring OBJ as a sell high, so I don't think anyone is buying.