Trade Questions and Advice

Post Reply  
Great White Shark
Posts: 2136
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010
Sand$: 6,444.60
farhad7 wrote:By "opponent" did you mean the person that you're trading with?

JRob might still be useful for you given that all three of your other RBs ahead of him could have injury questions. And Brady still has a very nice schedule for the rest of the season, including an excellent playoff schedule coming off a Week 13 bye:

Week 14 MIN
Week 15 ATL
Week 16 DET
Week 17 ATL

Not saying you shouldn't go for it, but some additional info worth considering.

I played him this week (expect to win) thus why I put opponent instead. lol

After I posted, I was reconsidering. Thought about throwing a WR instead, as he's shorter on WRs, although he has 2nd tier RBs (especially now that Zeke is flopping without Dak).

I'll probably scrap it. I like hoarding RBs.

EDIT: just saw JAX is going to start a rookie, and no guarantee they'd keep Minshew after he's healthy, per the report. So not sure how JRob will do moving forward.
Leopard Shark
Posts: 197
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011
Sand$: 326.76
1/2 point pr start 2 of each
Rb's Cooners,Sanders,Edmonds, Swift, Moss,Hasty
WR's- Mclaurin, Atonoio Brown, Aiyuk, Landry, Theilin.

Watched the whole vikings packers game and am starting to believe that as bad as Cousins is and as good as Cook is Thielens targets are going to suffer.

Would you trade Conners and Thelien for Metcalf and Carson
User avatar
Great White Shark
Posts: 6644
Joined: Wed Sep 7, 2011
Sand$: 12,145.02
If I had metcalf/carson i would NOT make that trade.
User avatar
Megalodon
Posts: 15349
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2003
Sand$: 39,226.70
Brittl wrote:1/2 point pr start 2 of each
Rb's Cooners,Sanders,Edmonds, Swift, Moss,Hasty
WR's- Mclaurin, Atonoio Brown, Aiyuk, Landry, Theilin.

Watched the whole vikings packers game and am starting to believe that as bad as Cousins is and as good as Cook is Thielens targets are going to suffer.

Would you trade Conners and Thelien for Metcalf and Carson


Yes, but can't think of a good reason the team giving up Metcalf and Carson would make that trade.
_______________________________________

"If you can't spot the sucker in your first half hour at the table, then you are the sucker."
-Mike McD, Rounders
User avatar
Supreme Megalodon
Posts: 34726
Joined: Mon Sep 6, 2004
Sand$: 43,852.86
Brittl wrote:1/2 point pr start 2 of each
Rb's Cooners,Sanders,Edmonds, Swift, Moss,Hasty
WR's- Mclaurin, Atonoio Brown, Aiyuk, Landry, Theilin.

Watched the whole vikings packers game and am starting to believe that as bad as Cousins is and as good as Cook is Thielens targets are going to suffer.

Would you trade Conners and Thelien for Metcalf and Carson


The other team is giving up a better version of Conner and Theilen, so yes.
_______________________________________

I'm a dude.
Leopard Shark
Posts: 197
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011
Sand$: 326.76
He has 3 packer running backs and Carson and Latavious Murray. So he needs a back . Plus he has Lockett, Ridley, AJ brown
User avatar
Great White Shark
Posts: 4693
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009
Sand$: 8,156.58
FantasyHussy wrote:
Brittl wrote:1/2 point pr start 2 of each
Rb's Cooners,Sanders,Edmonds, Swift, Moss,Hasty
WR's- Mclaurin, Atonoio Brown, Aiyuk, Landry, Theilin.

Watched the whole vikings packers game and am starting to believe that as bad as Cousins is and as good as Cook is Thielens targets are going to suffer.

Would you trade Conners and Thelien for Metcalf and Carson


The other team is giving up a better version of Conner and Theilen, so yes.


Hellz yeah
_______________________________________

It is impossible to defeat an ignorant man in argument.
William G. McAdoo
Supreme Megalodon
Posts: 73320
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2004
Sand$: 316,853.87
Agreed as well
_______________________________________

Image Image

Image
Leopard Shark
Posts: 197
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011
Sand$: 326.76
If he counters with Ridley is it still a good deal
Supreme Megalodon
Posts: 30096
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008
Sand$: 74,666.68
Brittl wrote:If he counters with Ridley is it still a good deal


Yes
User avatar
Megalodon
Posts: 15349
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2003
Sand$: 39,226.70
Brittl wrote:If he counters with Ridley is it still a good deal

yes
_______________________________________

"If you can't spot the sucker in your first half hour at the table, then you are the sucker."
-Mike McD, Rounders
User avatar
Whale Shark
Posts: 1063
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008
Sand$: 7,730.68
Brittl wrote:If he counters with Ridley is it still a good deal


If he counters I would think it would be Lockett. I wouldnt want both Metcalf and Lockett as opposed to trading away Ridley. Just thinking here.
_______________________________________

12Team Standard
QB: Murray
RB: Carson, Mostert, Edwards-Helaire, Monty, Harris, Hyde
WR: Jones, Robinson, Lockett, Reagor
TE: Henry
K: Koo
Def: Seattle
Def player: D. White
Lineup: QB RB WR Flex Flex Flex TE K Def
Mako Shark
Posts: 554
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2010
Sand$: 1,049.40
Agree with their takes.

Mine is standard league (2rb-2wr-1f).
RBs are CEH, Miles, Swift, JJackson (Akers, Wilkins)
WR Golladay, MThomas, DK, JJefferson
TE Andrews, Goedert

Give - Andrews, Swift
Get - Edmonds + Fant

He has Jacobs, Robinson, Carson but countered my ask of Jacobs. If Drake were out ROS ..
User avatar
Moderator
Posts: 40927
Joined: Fri Sep 3, 2004
Sand$: 21,649.92
RB Edmonds Hasty Jackson McKinnon Bernard Brieda Mike Davis Akers
WRs Fuller Aiyuk Green Mooney

I was offered Tee Higgins for Justin Jackson


I take it right?
User avatar
Megalodon
Posts: 20839
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012
Sand$: 24,208.20
Lundy Love wrote:RB Edmonds Hasty Jackson McKinnon Bernard Brieda Mike Davis Akers
WRs Fuller Aiyuk Green Mooney

I was offered Tee Higgins for Justin Jackson


I take it right?

yes...he'd be your best wr
_______________________________________

"If I shot at you with a gun and the only reason you were alive was because I missed how would you feel?"