OarChambo wrote:Cyguy84 wrote:I'm only suggesting it as a plausible scenario. While it may seem unlikely, it is plausible to me, and therefore I don't see his public omission as proof of anything either way.
That mirrors what I was thinking when ezv asked, but I'd rather keep my thoughts out of the conversation given my rooting interests. Plus I generally try to avoid these subjects when they surface in the tank - they have a tendency to get ugly. I'm not with this one because one of the parties happens to be on my team.
I don't avoid these subjects, and probably end up discussing them more than others simply because I try to see all potential scenarios and don't like jumping to conclusions without further evidence. Flipside, when the evidence is sufficient for me to reach a conclusion, I am probably more likely to reach that conclusion while others think that it is ambiguous.
Luckily, EZV has been very diplomatic. I only jumped in because I have no bias for or against the Browns, so I'm just sharing my perspective as an outsider.